• Hi Guest Just in case you were not aware I wanted to highlight that you can now get a free 7 day trial of Horseracebase here.
    We have a lot of members who are existing users of Horseracebase so help is always available if needed, as well as dedicated section of the fourm here.
    Best Wishes
    AR

Compiling Speed figures.

One horse the handicapper is likely to hammer is KHALOOSY, his maiden success at two was very impressive and i might be biased but for me he won like a very good horse last thursday. Officially rated 94 then if the sectionals support what your eye tells you he will get at least another stone tomorrow. He could be even better on quicker ground and should get 10f, definitely a group horse imo but maybe others have already sussed.
Only one past winner has won NTO from 20 past winners

1521FBD2-2462-4F62-93B0-D5F0DE407D69.jpeg
 
Excellent discussion guys, excellent thread
My experimental no weight speed and class figures threw up Art Power and Alpine Star as winners to follow from the meeting .

HORSESPEEDCLASSBetter than Class
Art Power (IRE)
117.63​
115.70​
1.93​
Alpine Star (IRE)
120.39​
118.84​
1.55​
Dark Vision (IRE)
117.54​
116.12​
1.42​
Palace Pier
119.88​
118.77​
1.12​
Khaloosy (IRE)
115.85​
114.76​
1.09​
Frankly Darling
113.06​
112.62​
0.44​
Hey Jonesy (IRE)
115.73​
115.44​
0.29​
Motakhayyel
115.29​
115.12​
0.17​
Coeur de Lion
112.91​
113.05​
-0.15​
Highland Chief (IRE)
114.19​
114.37​
-0.18​
Chiefofchiefs
114.09​
114.27​
-0.18​
Sir Busker (IRE)
113.95​
114.14​
-0.19​
Onassis (IRE)
110.94​
111.14​
-0.20​
Hukum (IRE)
111.60​
112.02​
-0.43​
Russian Emperor (IRE)
115.21​
115.68​
-0.46​
Battaash (IRE)
119.62​
120.21​
-0.59​
Molatham
115.26​
116.07​
-0.81​
Pyledriver
115.17​
115.99​
-0.82​
Fujaira Prince (IRE)
112.49​
114.40​
-1.91​
Lord North (IRE)
115.75​
117.87​
-2.12​
Campanelle (IRE)
115.72​
117.95​
-2.23​
Golden Horde (IRE)
115.28​
117.56​
-2.28​
Stradivarius (IRE)
117.10​
119.42​
-2.32​
Hello Youmzain (FR)
116.01​
118.36​
-2.35​
Santiago (IRE)
110.90​
113.50​
-2.60​
Tactical
115.40​
118.19​
-2.79​
The Lir Jet (IRE)
113.02​
116.23​
-3.21​
Scarlet Dragon
109.72​
113.19​
-3.47​
Mountain Angel (IRE)
112.53​
116.11​
-3.58​
Who Dares Wins (IRE)
108.40​
112.59​
-4.19​
Fanny Logan (IRE)
111.51​
115.71​
-4.21​
Nazeef
108.55​
113.72​
-5.17​
Circus Maximus (IRE)
110.08​
116.12​
-6.03​
Battleground (USA)
109.61​
116.15​
-6.55​
Nando Parrado
108.99​
115.72​
-6.73​
Dandalla (IRE)
108.14​
116.06​
-7.92​
Likewise but I would add to that Dark Vision who I rated with my experimental weight free ratings (103) with my new Pace ratings of a very fast overall pace of (-3) Must be bordering on Grp class after his win in the Hunt Cup.
Art Power (101) (.01) and Alpine Star (103) (-04)
 
J Jamie_E
Based on the sectionals I can see why you would conclude the difference favouring Palace Pier, but the sectionals only conclude that the early pace was faster in Alpine Star‘s race or she ran a more even gallop, whereas Palace Piers early pace would be slower, hence the rapid acceleration in the final three furlongs, but still, Alpine Star’ final time was still .17 secs faster. As my ratings are weight free for this race I wouldn’t understand where a whopping 17lb upgrade would come from for Palace Pier.
My limited understanding of times/sectionals is that the fastest times will depend on there being an even pace, go too fast early and you will pay later, go too slow early and you get the opposite.
Athletes trying to break the 1500 mtr record would have various pacemakers trying to get the fractions right each lap and i recall brendan foster saying if they get the first lap wrong they will fail and on that occassion it did go wrong, complicating stuff but does this not demonstrate that understanding times without knowing the sectionals is just about impossible. imo
 
My limited understanding of times/sectionals is that the fastest times will depend on there being an even pace, go too fast early and you will pay later, go too slow early and you get the opposite.
Athletes trying to break the 1500 mtr record would have various pacemakers trying to get the fractions right each lap and i recall brendan foster saying if they get the first lap wrong they will fail and on that occassion it did go wrong, complicating stuff but does this not demonstrate that understanding times without knowing the sectionals is just about impossible. imo
I presume sectional times are available? I shall check out Chesham Chesham post. But didn't the BHA experiment with sectionals and the trainers weren't too happy having to have a chip on the saddle or something, I vaguely remember.
 
Ok thanks T tacker will check it out And see if it gives me a better understanding of the figures. From what I have seen though it looks quite Intimidating. But if it’s going to help me get more of an edge I will have a go. 👍
 
Sectionals straight mile ascot.....KHALOOSY V ONASSIS. going descibed as soft.

k...14.98 / 11.60 / 12.02 / 12.36 / 12.22 / 12.15 / 12.55 / 13.33 total =1m 41.22s

O..15.77 / 12.60 / 12.84 / 12.91 / 12.53 / 11.62 / 11.85 / 12.57 total = 1m 42.89s

When you watch KHALOOSY he appears to be flying in the last 2f but clearly not in comparrison to ONASSIS.

So the first 5 furlongs shows K to be running faster than O but it changes over for the last 3f, if this doesn't demonstrate the importance of pace i don't know what could. The american articles that chesham has put up might not seem be all that relevant over a straight mile but i would have thought it proves the point about the value of pace in the race, in fact there might be a case for allowing "sectionbals " to dominate your appraoach but at the moment i'm hanging on to the idea that they are still part of the overall pattern of reading form.

One last point i want to make is the riding of KHALOOSY by Crowley a jockey i like but it surprises me that he went from cantering to maximum effort just inside the 2 pole, this had the effect of unbalancing the horse and likely why he drifted to the right, yet he still won 4 1/2 and seem to take 10L or so out of most of the field, all a matter of opinion but worth a natter.
 
Onassis is more likely to, win NTO from the Ascot Race, compared to Khaloosy . Intersting that the Race Comments suggest Khaloosy was quickening at the end but was just slowing down the least. Did run over 40MPH which I suspect caused the slowing down towards the end, took a lot out of the horse.

The NTO results for the winners of the race that Khaloosy won is 1/20 with Onassis it looks like they can progress to Listed and Grp NTO

401BA877-58FD-4083-A542-7FEB99C270DD.jpeg08D0BA40-E940-4BA4-A5CD-FD5990E1EF9B.jpeg
D9BA2F8B-844B-49E8-83FE-8AFFFCC5F4AA.jpeg
 
One horse the handicapper is likely to hammer is KHALOOSY, his maiden success at two was very impressive and i might be biased but for me he won like a very good horse last thursday. Officially rated 94 then if the sectionals support what your eye tells you he will get at least another stone tomorrow. He could be even better on quicker ground and should get 10f, definitely a group horse imo but maybe others have already sussed.
BHA now rate this horse 111.
 
The theory behind it is if Alpine Star ran to a pace where she expended her energy evenly through the race, that is the time that best reflects what she is capable of. Palace Pier nearly matched this time yet gave Alpine Star a 15-20 length headstart at the 3 furlong pole. It shows the energy he had available to him and the turn of foot he possesses. I'm very confident that if this energy was distributed evenly through a race his final time would be much quicker than Alpine Star's.
I think you've got this spot on J Jamie_E and further demonstrate that the numbers still need to be analysed or interpreted, watching the st james again you have to ask if aiden o'brien is over thinking the tactics to the point where he is spoiling the races.
 
Although I am of course a devout speed man, one of the most important aspects for me is to watch the replays of the last couple of furlongs of any horse I am rating or for a bet. Does the figure match the way the horse accelerated, yes sectionals can tell you the figures and they can confirm the speed, but sometimes you can spot a horse doing double handfuls and not quite getting there, or hampered, or wrong trip and win easy next time out at a good price. The figures by themselves can't reflect these instances. So of course although I agree all the tech information and calculations are important , for me , the final piece of the puzzle is always visual.
 
BHA now rate this horse 111.
Hello T tacker
On my Time/ Ability ratings I would have KHALOOSY on 110 and on my experimental speed/pace I have 97 speed and .04 Pace. Whichever figures you use its without doubt this horse is potentially very smart. Of course I'm smug as I backed it at Ascot based on its win last year in a novice race at Wolverhampton by 4.5 lengths. It didnt record a great time it was just the way it won. Looked Class all over and so it proved.
I am leaning more towards my new speed and pace figures as although I have now a method which can give me figures comparable to the OR, I might as well use the OR as a back up to my new figures which are proving pretty good at the mo. I stress, at the mo !
 
Onassis is more likely to, win NTO from the Ascot Race, compared to Khaloosy . Intersting that the Race Comments suggest Khaloosy was quickening at the end but was just slowing down the least. Did run over 40MPH which I suspect caused the slowing down towards the end, took a lot out of the horse.

The NTO results for the winners of the race that Khaloosy won is 1/20 with Onassis it looks like they can progress to Listed and Grp NTO

Khaloosy, like most Britannia winners, will step up to group class but I think he's definitely capable. I rated his victory 107 which would be good enough to win a group 2. He has a much better chance of making his mark than last year's winner, Biometric who only rated 94 in winning the same race.

Onassis has been allotted a new mark of 87 so you'd think she will stick to handicaps. The way she quickened on arguably the slower side of the track from a slow pace (106.46 FS%) was impressive. She was only carrying 8-1 but I still think she might be able to be competitive off her new mark.

Although I am of course a devout speed man, one of the most important aspects for me is to watch the replays of the last couple of furlongs of any horse I am rating or for a bet. Does the figure match the way the horse accelerated, yes sectionals can tell you the figures and they can confirm the speed, but sometimes you can spot a horse doing double handfuls and not quite getting there, or hampered, or wrong trip and win easy next time out at a good price. The figures by themselves can't reflect these instances. So of course although I agree all the tech information and calculations are important , for me , the final piece of the puzzle is always visual.

100%. You can't rely on numbers, they have to have context.
 
Not sure if anyone agrees but Que Amoro was very impressive to me at Ayr on Monday. Rated 107 she should be able to go up to group class next. She held her head quite high - I'm not convinced she'd want anything slower than good ground, but Dods always seems to find these quality sprinters!
 
Hi J Jamie_E

You have to go back to 2003 and Mew Seeker who won the Britannia of BHA 87 and won NTO class 2 Hndicap off 95. I’m not saying a horse should be written off for winning the Britannia as some win after their NTO race, perhaps the Brittania takes it out of them for the NTO Race.

Looking at Quo Amoro

Listted would be a good option NTO

6833D6EA-93A0-4582-B5B0-02DCA28852E5.jpeg

I have been running a Thread on the Blog which looks at Positives for Horses who have competed in Trend Races and their NTO chances
 
Back
Top