With hindsight, I should perhaps have copied my post from the Bowers thread and included it in my post 1053 on this one. Easily rectified:
"re VDW's method, I think I posted a table showing how a VDW analysis is undertaken, using one of his examples, but I can't immediately find it, so I have re-screenshotted it and posted it on the class/form thread of the VDW section rather than disrupt this one, other than to point out it is a three stage process. Ranking the ability ratings (a wholly objective process), applying VDW's method of rating form status (equally objective, when one has worked out what it is) and checking for disqualifying negatives among the conditions issues (distance, going, course type and weight). The top horse in the ability column with a yes in the form status column and not a no in the conditions column is the VDW class/form horse, whether one is considering a race run thirty-eight years ago, yesterday or being run tomorrow."
That, the Pegwell Bay grid in post 1053, and the pre-race example set out in post 1055, describe the VDW approach as I see it (others such as
formtheory and possibly
nagwa, have reached different conclusions). The other class/form horse mentioned, Artagnan, was found in exactly the same way.