• Hi Guest Just in case you were not aware I wanted to highlight that you can now get a free 7 day trial of Horseracebase here.
    We have a lot of members who are existing users of Horseracebase so help is always available if needed, as well as dedicated section of the fourm here.
    Best Wishes
    AR

Compiling Speed figures.

Newcastle Good Friday Cards:
 

Attachments

  • 1_15 Newcastle (AW) _ Standard Racecard _ 3 April 2026 _ Racing Post_Compressed.pdf
    296.8 KB · Views: 6
  • 1_50 Newcastle (AW) _ Standard Racecard _ 3 April 2026 _ Racing Post_Compressed.pdf
    375.9 KB · Views: 7
  • 2_25 Newcastle (AW) _ Standard Racecard _ 3 April 2026 _ Racing Post_Compressed.pdf
    357.2 KB · Views: 4
  • 3_00 Newcastle (AW) _ Standard Racecard _ 3 April 2026 _ Racing Post_Compressed.pdf
    528.4 KB · Views: 7
  • 4_10 Newcastle (AW) _ Standard Racecard _ 3 April 2026 _ Racing Post_Compressed.pdf
    566.9 KB · Views: 6
  • 3_35 Newcastle (AW) _ Standard Racecard _ 3 April 2026 _ Racing Post_Compressed.pdf
    682.5 KB · Views: 7
  • 4_42 Newcastle (AW) _ Standard Racecard _ 3 April 2026 _ Racing Post_Compressed.pdf
    477.9 KB · Views: 3
I can't find anything regarding this performance from ORGANISE ?
Something very impressive about this performance imo, not the absolute worse race and there was something of note within the numbers.

 
The two 6f races at newc were very telling in that the 3.35 was a very decent cl2 hdc where to my eye the front end went far too quick early which aided the first three home all come from the back including WILTSHIRE, trouble with that logic is when we look at the 1.50 cl2 3yr only race, it was run at an even stronger early pace and so i'm not at all surprised to see AL NAJASHI at +12.
The sectionals are fascinating imo.
 
8.00 wolvs ?
If there's good reason to believe BETWEENTHESTICKS deserves a +10 it surely follows that SHALAA ASKER also warrants a boost given he was just a head behind and might not have got the best of runs at about 1f out.
How do we assess these numbers going forward ?
Ages of 6 & 8 with both horses seemingly having the correct marks of lower or mid 60s so my take would be to be careful about plus 10 ,
sectionals were good especially late on but for me they don't explain why the first two did so well, also the 3rd and 4th were close enough.
ORGANISE did go into my tracker the other day.
edit meant AL NAJASHI
 
Last edited:
If there's good reason to believe BETWEENTHESTICKS deserves a +10 it surely follows that SHALAA ASKER also warrants a boost given he was just a head behind and might not have got the best of runs at about 1f out.
Closing 2f sectional: 23.20 (103.1%); winner 22.80 (104.9%).
BETWEENTHESTICKS, who saved ground and got a good tow into the straight, had been off since October but resumed off his last winning mark and did just enough.
Shalaa Asker was closing the winner down in the final stages but he'd had to concede first run having travelled best, and was never quite getting there.
******************************************************************************************
J
ust add 17lbs to the speed figures (MR) to see what handicap marks they ran to.

8.10Wolv.PNG
 
Back
Top