Back in 2017, when the BHA measured the race distances at Musselburgh, the 7-furlong distance was 7f33yds.ike , do you know what happened at Musselburgh 7f 33yds 2023 vs 7f 15yds in 2024? Did they move the distance?
| Horse | Odds | Signals | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ardaddy | 5/1 | draw 4/5 · strongly backed · RPR ahead of hcp · CD winner · trainer 32% w/Front Runners · SP↓ vs last run | |
| Mini Mac | 10/11 | draw 4/5 · strongly backed · Master Rating +7 · RPR ahead of hcp · C/D winner · SP↓ vs last run | |
| Coulsty Exchange | 15/2 | draw 4/5 · RPR ahead of hcp · trainer 32% w/Front Runners | |
| Zabriskie Point | 6/1 | RPR ahead of hcp · C/D winner · trainer 37% w/Front Runners | |
| Diligent Henry | 16/1 | RPR ahead of hcp · C/D winner · trainer 45% w/Front Runners |
| # | Horse | Draw | OR | Odds | Wgt | DSLR | Bowers | Pace Profile | Draw Score | Bonuses | KNN | Final Score | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coulsty Exchange t I Jardine / A Mullen | 2 | 50 | 15/2 SP 8.5 card: 6/1 | 130 | 13 | #5 | Front Runner 60% FR / 20% HU 9/10 5 runs | Stall 2 | 🏋 Trainer 32% with Front Runners (86/273) +4.6 | 0% Poor | 12.21 | bf |
| 4✓ 1✗ | Going ? | Distance ? | Fit ✓ | Form ✗ | Draw ✓ | RPR ✓ | Trainer ✓ | ||||||
| 2 | Ardaddy M Appleby / K Stott | 4 | 51 ✓ | 5/1 SP 6.0 card: 10/1 | 131 | 201 | #4 | Front Runner 68% FR / 16% HU 7/10 19 runs | Stall 4 | 🏋 Trainer 32% with Front Runners (101/311) +4.91 | 0% Poor | 11.94 | CD |
| 4✓ 1✗ | Going ? | Distance ✓ | Fit ? | Form ✗ | Draw ✓ | RPR ✓ | Trainer ✓ | ||||||
| 3 | Zabriskie Point t1 v A McGuinness / S M Levey | 9 | 53 ✓ | 6/1 SP 7.0 card: 8/1 | 133 | 17 | #3 | Front Runner 80% FR / 0% HU 9/10 5 runs | ⚠ 2/5 Stall 9 | 🏋 Trainer 37% with Front Runners (55/149) +3.27 | 40% Moderate | 10.83 | D |
| 4✓ 2✗ | Going ? | Distance ✓ | Fit ✓ | Form ✗ | Draw ✗ | RPR ✓ | Trainer ✓ | ||||||
| 4 | Little Beck Annie p P D Niven / Mark Winn | 11 | 54 ✓ | 12/1 SP 13.0 card: 13/2 | 134 | 14 | #2 | Versatile 25% FR / 0% HU 5/10 4 runs | ⚠ 2/5 Stall 11 | +4.6 | 0% Poor | 10.79 | |
| 4✓ 1✗ | Going ? | Distance ? | Fit ✓ | Form ✓ | Draw ✗ | RPR ✓ | Trainer ✓ | ||||||
| 5 | Mini Mac b James Owen / Marco Ghiani | 3 | 55 ✓ | 10/11 SP 1.91 card: 11/4 | 135 | 2 | #1 | Hold-Up 0% FR / 67% HU 2/10 3 runs | Stall 3 | ⏱ Stopwatch: last run +7.0lb vs field average — fast +4.72 | 0% Poor | 10.57 | D |
| 5✓ 0✗ | Going ? | Distance ✓ | Fit ? | Form ✓ | Draw ✓ | RPR ✓ | Trainer ✓ | ||||||
| 6 | Diligent Henry G Tutty / D Allan | 6 | 46 | 16/1 SP 17.0 card: 16/1 | 126 | 130 | #6 | Front Runner 61% FR / 6% HU 9/10 18 runs | — 3/5 Stall 6 | 🏋 Trainer 45% with Front Runners (27/60) +0.27 | 0% Poor | 7.39 | D |
| 3✓ 1✗ | Going ? | Distance ✓ | Fit ? | Form ✗ | Draw ~ | RPR ✓ | Trainer ✓ | ||||||
| 7 | Blackjack b A D Brown / Rowan Scott | 13 | 55 ✓ | 40/1 SP 41.0 card: 25/1 | 135 | 42 | #7 | Front Runner 71% FR / 18% HU 6/10 17 runs | ⚠ 2/5 Stall 13 | — | — | — | C |
| 3✓ 2✗ | Going ? | Distance ✓ | Fit ? | Form ✗ | Draw ✗ | RPR ✓ | Trainer ✓ | ||||||
| 8 | Bad Habits b Mrs R Carr / J P Sullivan | 10 | 55 ✓ | 25/1 SP 26.0 card: 14/1 | 135 | 35 | #7 | Prominent 52% FR / 26% HU 9/10 27 runs | ⚠ 2/5 Stall 10 | — | — | — | D |
| 2✓ 2✗ | Going ? | Distance ✓ | Fit ? | Form ✗ | Draw ✗ | RPR ✓ | Trainer ? | ||||||
| 9 | Sanditon p C Johnston / Callum Shepherd | 7 | 52 ✓ | 20/1 SP 21.0 card: 12/1 | 132 | 16 | #7 | Versatile 25% FR / 0% HU 5/10 4 runs | — 3/5 Stall 7 | — | — | — | D |
| 3✓ 1✗ | Going ? | Distance ✓ | Fit ✓ | Form ✗ | Draw ~ | RPR ✓ | Trainer ? | ||||||
| 10 | Tilsworth Max J R Jenkins / Jonny Peate | 12 | 50 | 25/1 SP 26.0 card: 7/1 | 130 | 31 | #7 | Versatile 33% FR / 33% HU 7/10 3 runs | ⚠ 2/5 Stall 12 | — | — | — | D |
| 3✓ 1✗ | Going ? | Distance ✓ | Fit ? | Form ✓ | Draw ✗ | RPR ✓ | Trainer ? | ||||||
| 11 | Mickey Mongoose b Olly Williams / D Fentiman | 8 | 47 | 22/1 SP 23.0 card: 14/1 | 127 | 14 | #7 | Hold-Up 25% FR / 50% HU 6/10 4 runs | — 3/5 Stall 8 | — | — | — | CD |
| 4✓ 1✗ | Going ? | Distance ✓ | Fit ✓ | Form ✗ | Draw ~ | RPR ✓ | Trainer ✓ | ||||||
| 12 | Regal Guest b1 G G Margarson / R Havlin | 1 | 46 | 66/1 SP 67.0 card: 25/1 | 126 | 72 | #7 | Front Runner 67% FR / 22% HU 7/10 9 runs | Stall 1 | — | — | — | |
| 3✓ 1✗ | Going ? | Distance ? | Fit ? | Form ✗ | Draw ✓ | RPR ✓ | Trainer ✓ | ||||||
| 13 | She's A Goldigger M Walford / Billy Garritty | 5 | 46 | 50/1 SP 51.0 card: 20/1 | 126 | 43 | #7 | Unknown 0% FR / 0% HU 5/10 No history | — 3/5 Stall 5 | — | — | — | |
| 0✓ 1✗ | Going ? | Distance ? | Fit ? | Form ✗ | Draw ~ | RPR ? | Trainer ? |
Can you not do it as it is - the problem with a vote is members may be just inclined to tick a box with reasoning shownWould there be any interest perhaps from 2027 onwards putting this thread on a more formal footing. There could be a good way of finding a signal amongst the inputs, perhaps via reinforcement learning. What I am alluding to is a perhaps a scrapeable input or maybe utilising the poll function
| Horse | OR | Full Flat MR List | Best MR | Best 2 Avg | MR+17 | (MR+17)-OR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ardaddy | 51 | 22,24,33,24,24,48 | 48 | 40.5 | 57.5 | +6.5 |
| Zabriskie Point | 53 | 15,28,50,23,32,49 | 50 | 49.5 | 66.5 | +13.5 |
| Mini Mac | 55 | 36,33,30,44,31,22 | 44 | 40.0 | 57.0 | +2.0 |
| Coulsty Exchange | 50 | 0,8,18,0,19 | 19 | 18.5 | 35.5 | -14.5 |
| Little Beck Annie | 54 | 28,16,23,34,37,24 | 37 | 35.5 | 52.5 | -1.5 |
| Diligent Henry | 46 | 21,25,7,33,21,20 | 33 | 29.0 | 46.0 | 0.0 |
| Bad Habits | 55 | 29,50,39,18,40,35 | 50 | 45.0 | 62.0 | +7.0 |
| Blackjack | 55 | 21,39,8,33,25,36 | 39 | 37.5 | 54.5 | -0.5 |
| Tilsworth Max | 50 | 35,31,19,24,18,23 | 35 | 33.0 | 50.0 | 0.0 |
| Mickey Mongoose | 47 | 20,29,0,3,21,28 | 29 | 28.5 | 45.5 | -1.5 |
| Sanditon | 52 | 24,37,22,0,27,24 | 37 | 32.0 | 49.0 | -3.0 |
| She's A Goldigger | 46 | 12,11,17,29,18,34 | 34 | 31.5 | 48.5 | +2.5 |
| Regal Guest | 46 | 12,20,0,10,0,5 | 20 | 16.0 | 33.0 | -13.0 |
Rank | Horse | Best MR | Best 2 Avg | OR | MR+17 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1= | Zabriskie Point | 50 | 49.5 | 53 | 66.5 | +13.5 |
1= | Bad Habits | 50 | 45.0 | 55 | 62.0 | +7.0 |
3 | Ardaddy | 48 | 40.5 | 51 | 57.5 | +6.5 |
4 | Mini Mac | 44 | 40.0 | 55 | 57.0 | +2.0 |
5 | Blackjack | 39 | 37.5 | 55 | 54.5 | -0.5 |
6= | Little Beck Annie | 37 | 35.5 | 54 | 52.5 | -1.5 |
6= | Sanditon | 37 | 32.0 | 52 | 49.0 | -3.0 |
8 | Tilsworth Max | 35 | 33.0 | 50 | 50.0 | 0.0 |
9 | She's A Goldigger | 34 | 31.5 | 46 | 48.5 | +2.5 |
10 | Diligent Henry | 33 | 29.0 | 46 | 46.0 | 0.0 |
11 | Mickey Mongoose | 29 | 28.5 | 47 | 45.5 | -1.5 |
12 | Regal Guest | 20 | 16.0 | 46 | 33.0 | -13.0 |
13 | Coulsty Exchange | 19 | 18.5 | 50 | 35.5 | -14.5 |
As it is had lots of different format from people inputs, some just put their ratings up which often are images. If people agree to head their post with Selection is Frankel then yes as it is could be scraped and processed. At the moment just want to get a feel if people would like some data analysis of the input's. There would be no naming and shaming, the process would simply take the inputs and attempt to find profitable patternsCan you not do it as it is - the problem with a vote is members may be just inclined to tick a box with reasoning shown
It's not straight forward to scrape this forum by the way.As it is had lots of different format from people inputs, some just put their ratings up which often are images. If people agree to head their post with Selection is Frankel then yes as it is could be scraped and processed. At the moment just want to get a feel if people would like some data analysis of the input's. There would be no naming and shaming, the process would simply take the inputs and attempt to find profitable patterns
Is that because you still want to do the Wisdom of The Crowd Research, might be difficult with a poll as some select 2 or 3 horses In a BookAs it is had lots of different format from people inputs, some just put their ratings up which often are images. If people agree to head their post with Selection is Frankel then yes as it is could be scraped and processed. At the moment just want to get a feel if people would like some data analysis of the input's. There would be no naming and shaming, the process would simply take the inputs and attempt to find profitable patterns
How do you analyse their input if it’s just a name - scraping I have ideaAs it is had lots of different format from people inputs, some just put their ratings up which often are images. If people agree to head their post with Selection is Frankel then yes as it is could be scraped and processed. At the moment just want to get a feel if people would like some data analysis of the input's. There would be no naming and shaming, the process would simply take the inputs and attempt to find profitable patterns
'just a name' do you mean the tipster or the horse ?How do you analyse their input if it’s just a name - scraping I have ideaArkRoyal needs to be consulted - but I have problem with some keeping score always bearing mind these races do offer the possibilty of Dutching (sorry
ARAZI91 Duuutcccchhhinggg its like someone dragging their finger nails over a black board)
If you select 2 or 3 thats not a problem, I generally select 2 and they both get loggedIs that because you still want to do the Wisdom of The Crowd Research, might be difficult with a poll as some select 2 or 3 horses In a Book
well i was thinking you would want the horse ? but'just a name' do you mean the tipster or the horse ?
Well it would help if people spell the horse correctly but if its close we can derive the selectionwell i was thinking you would want the horse ? but