• Hi Guest Just in case you were not aware I wanted to highlight that you can now get a free 7 day trial of Horseracebase here.
    We have a lot of members who are existing users of Horseracebase so help is always available if needed, as well as dedicated section of the fourm here.
    Best Wishes
    AR

Uk Betting Forum Common Race of Day

My two for the race are: Coulsty Exchange and Mini Mac

18:30 AWC Season 14 Has Begun Handicap (Div 2) Southwell • Flat • 7f 15y • Standard (AW - Tapeta) • Class 6

🔍 CONVERGENCE ALERT — 5 horse(s) with 3+ signals aligning

HorseOddsSignalsVerdict
Ardaddy5/1draw 4/5 · strongly backed · RPR ahead of hcp · CD winner · trainer 32% w/Front Runners · SP↓ vs last run⚡ NOT BOWERS BUT!
Mini Mac10/11draw 4/5 · strongly backed · Master Rating +7 · RPR ahead of hcp · C/D winner · SP↓ vs last run👀 WATCH
Coulsty Exchange15/2draw 4/5 · RPR ahead of hcp · trainer 32% w/Front Runners❌ ELIMINATED
Zabriskie Point6/1RPR ahead of hcp · C/D winner · trainer 37% w/Front Runners⭐ CONTENDER
Diligent Henry16/1 ⚠️ odds≥runnersRPR ahead of hcp · C/D winner · trainer 45% w/Front Runners❌ ELIMINATED

✅ PERFECTLY BALANCED RACE • Weight range: 126–135lbs (9lbs spread) • Midpoint: 130.5lbs • Median weight (131lbs) is 0.5lbs from midpoint — Bowers weight ×1.3 (historically +21.8% ROI) • Median OR: 51 (OR ✓ = at/above median)

🏟 Southwell: Left-handed • Favoured draw: Low (STRONG BIAS) • 7-9f — draw moderately important
Left-handed AW Fibresand. Low draws (rail) consistently favoured — early speed at low stalls very important.

🗺️ Pace Map — Expected Early Positions Very hot pace expected

Front Runner

Coulsty Exchange
60% FR • Stall 2
Ardaddy
68% FR • Stall 4
Zabriskie Point
80% FR • Stall 9
Diligent Henry
61% FR • Stall 6

Prominent

None

Versatile

Little Beck Annie
25% FR • Stall 11

Hold-Up

Mini Mac
0% FR • Stall 3

4 front runners want to lead — likely to contest a fast, hard-fought early pace that could set it up for hold-up horses to finish best.
Watch: Mini Mac (Stall 3)


#HorseDrawOROddsWgtDSLRBowersPace ProfileDraw ScoreBonusesKNNFinal ScoreVerdict
1Coulsty Exchange t
I Jardine / A Mullen
25015/2 SP
8.5
card: 6/1
13013❌
#5
Front Runner
60% FR / 20% HU

9/10
5 runs
⭐⭐ 4/5
Stall 2
💹 Drifting 7.0→15/2
🔄 SP longer than last run (2.8→8.5) ⚠️ | 2nd last run — placed profile ✓
🏆 Beaten fav
📋 2nd last run
📈 RPR 70 vs OR 50 — well ahead of hcp ⭐ | RPR 4pts below peak — may be underestimated ✓
📅 13 days — ideal freshness
🏋 Trainer 32% with Front Runners (86/273) ⭐
+4.6
0%
Poor
12.21 ❌ ELIMINATED
bf
4✓ 1✗Going
?
Distance
?
Fit
✓
Form
✗
Draw
✓
RPR
✓
Trainer
✓
2Ardaddy
M Appleby / K Stott
451 ✓5/1 SP
6.0
card: 10/1
131201❌
#4
Front Runner
68% FR / 16% HU

7/10
19 runs
⭐⭐ 4/5
Stall 4
💹 Strongly backed 11.0→5/1 ⭐
🔄 SP shorter than last run (10.0→6.0) ✓ | 3rd last run — placed profile ✓
🏆 Course winner | Distance winner
📋 3rd last run
📈 RPR 65 vs OR 51 — well ahead of hcp ⭐ | RPR declining -7pts ⚠️
🎥 RaceIQ FSP 106% last run (Southwell) — finished well above par ⭐
⭐ Master Rating +0 (as expected)
📅 201 days — very long absence ⚠️
🏋 Trainer 32% with Front Runners (101/311) ⭐
📊 IV 2.6 (Strong) — medium fields ✓ | sprint trips ✓
+4.91
0%
Poor
11.94 ⚡ NOT BOWERS BUT!
CD
4✓ 1✗Going
?
Distance
✓
Fit
?
Form
✗
Draw
✓
RPR
✓
Trainer
✓
3Zabriskie Point t1 v
A McGuinness / S M Levey
953 ✓6/1 SP
7.0
card: 8/1
13317✅
#3
Front Runner
80% FR / 0% HU

9/10
5 runs
⚠ 2/5
Stall 9
💹 Backed 9.0→6/1 ✓
🏆 Distance winner
📈 RPR 63 vs OR 53 — well ahead of hcp ⭐
🎥 RaceIQ FSP 95% last run (Doncaster) — finished below par ⚠️ | RaceIQ FSP trending down -9pts over last 3 runs
⭐ Master Rating -15 (well below handicapper expectations ⚠️)
🏋 Trainer 37% with Front Runners (55/149) ⭐
+3.27
40%
Moderate
10.83 ⭐ CONTENDER
D
4✓ 2✗Going
?
Distance
✓
Fit
✓
Form
✗
Draw
✗
RPR
✓
Trainer
✓
4Little Beck Annie p
P D Niven / Mark Winn
1154 ✓12/1 SP
13.0
card: 13/2
13414✅
#2
Versatile
25% FR / 0% HU

5/10
4 runs
⚠ 2/5
Stall 11
💹 Drifting badly 7.5→12/1 ⚠️
🔄 SP shorter than last run (23.0→13.0) ✓ | 2nd last run — placed profile ✓
📋 2nd last run | Consistent placer
📈 RPR 64 vs OR 54 — well ahead of hcp ⭐ | RPR 6pts below peak — may be underestimated ✓
🎥 RaceIQ FSP 105% last run (Newcastle) — solid finishing pace ✓ | RaceIQ FSP trending up +8pts over last 2 runs
⭐ Master Rating +0 (as expected)
📅 14 days — ideal freshness
📊 IV 2.86 (Strong) — medium fields ✓ | sprint trips ✓
+4.6
0%
Poor
10.79 👀 WATCH
4✓ 1✗Going
?
Distance
?
Fit
✓
Form
✓
Draw
✗
RPR
✓
Trainer
✓
5Mini Mac b
James Owen / Marco Ghiani
355 ✓10/11 SP
1.91
card: 11/4
1352✅
#1
Hold-Up
0% FR / 67% HU

2/10
3 runs
⭐⭐ 4/5
Stall 3
💹 Strongly backed 3.8→10/11 ⭐
🔄 SP shorter than last run (4.0→1.9) ✓ | won last run — placed profile ✓
🏆 Distance winner
📋 Won last run
📈 RPR 62 vs OR 55 — ahead of hcp ✓ | RPR declining -14pts ⚠️
⏱ Stopwatch: last run +7.0lb vs field average — fast ⭐
⭐ Master Rating +7 (running well above handicapper expectations ⭐)
📊 IV 2.34 (Strong) — medium fields ✓
+4.72
0%
Poor
10.57 👀 WATCH
D
5✓ 0✗Going
?
Distance
✓
Fit
?
Form
✓
Draw
✓
RPR
✓
Trainer
✓
6Diligent Henry
G Tutty / D Allan
64616/1 SP
17.0
card: 16/1
126130❌
#6
Front Runner
61% FR / 6% HU

9/10
18 runs
— 3/5
Stall 6
💹 Steady at 16/1
🏆 Distance winner
📈 RPR 69 vs OR 46 — well ahead of hcp ⭐ | RPR trending up +3pts
🎥 RaceIQ FSP 94% last run (Pontefract) — finished below par ⚠️
⭐ Master Rating -6 (below expectations ⚠️)
📅 130 days — long absence
🏋 Trainer 45% with Front Runners (27/60) ⭐
📊 IV 0.0 (Poor) — medium fields ⚠️ | sprint trips ⚠️
+0.27
0%
Poor
7.39 ❌ ELIMINATED
D
3✓ 1✗Going
?
Distance
✓
Fit
?
Form
✗
Draw
~
RPR
✓
Trainer
✓
7Blackjack b
A D Brown / Rowan Scott
1355 ✓40/1 SP
41.0
card: 25/1
13542❌
#7
Front Runner
71% FR / 18% HU

6/10
17 runs
⚠ 2/5
Stall 13
— —— 🚫 MARKET REJECT
C
3✓ 2✗Going
?
Distance
✓
Fit
?
Form
✗
Draw
✗
RPR
✓
Trainer
✓
8Bad Habits b
Mrs R Carr / J P Sullivan
1055 ✓25/1 SP
26.0
card: 14/1
13535❌
#7
Prominent
52% FR / 26% HU

9/10
27 runs
⚠ 2/5
Stall 10
— —— 🚫 MARKET REJECT
D
2✓ 2✗Going
?
Distance
✓
Fit
?
Form
✗
Draw
✗
RPR
✓
Trainer
?
9Sanditon p
C Johnston / Callum Shepherd
752 ✓20/1 SP
21.0
card: 12/1
13216❌
#7
Versatile
25% FR / 0% HU

5/10
4 runs
— 3/5
Stall 7
— —— 🚫 MARKET REJECT
D
3✓ 1✗Going
?
Distance
✓
Fit
✓
Form
✗
Draw
~
RPR
✓
Trainer
?
10Tilsworth Max
J R Jenkins / Jonny Peate
125025/1 SP
26.0
card: 7/1
13031❌
#7
Versatile
33% FR / 33% HU

7/10
3 runs
⚠ 2/5
Stall 12
— —— 🚫 MARKET REJECT
D
3✓ 1✗Going
?
Distance
✓
Fit
?
Form
✓
Draw
✗
RPR
✓
Trainer
?
11Mickey Mongoose b
Olly Williams / D Fentiman
84722/1 SP
23.0
card: 14/1
12714❌
#7
Hold-Up
25% FR / 50% HU

6/10
4 runs
— 3/5
Stall 8
— —— 🚫 MARKET REJECT
CD
4✓ 1✗Going
?
Distance
✓
Fit
✓
Form
✗
Draw
~
RPR
✓
Trainer
✓
12Regal Guest b1
G G Margarson / R Havlin
14666/1 SP
67.0
card: 25/1
12672❌
#7
Front Runner
67% FR / 22% HU

7/10
9 runs
⭐⭐ 4/5
Stall 1
— —— 🚫 MARKET REJECT
3✓ 1✗Going
?
Distance
?
Fit
?
Form
✗
Draw
✓
RPR
✓
Trainer
✓
13She's A Goldigger
M Walford / Billy Garritty
54650/1 SP
51.0
card: 20/1
12643❌
#7
Unknown
0% FR / 0% HU

5/10
No history
— 3/5
Stall 5
— —— 🚫 MARKET REJECT
0✓ 1✗Going
?
Distance
?
Fit
?
Form
✗
Draw
~
RPR
?
Trainer
?
 
Would there be any interest perhaps from 2027 onwards putting this thread on a more formal footing. There could be a good way of finding a signal amongst the inputs, perhaps via reinforcement learning. What I am alluding to is a perhaps a scrapeable input or maybe utilising the poll function
 
Would there be any interest perhaps from 2027 onwards putting this thread on a more formal footing. There could be a good way of finding a signal amongst the inputs, perhaps via reinforcement learning. What I am alluding to is a perhaps a scrapeable input or maybe utilising the poll function
Can you not do it as it is - the problem with a vote is members may be just inclined to tick a box with reasoning shown
 
18:30 Southwell (AW)

Zabriskie Point

Using Flat MR only (missing MR = 0), and your saved preference use only Flat MR for modelling, here's the recalculated table.
HorseORFull Flat MR List
Best MR​
Best 2 Avg​
MR+17​
(MR+17)-OR​
Ardaddy5122,24,33,24,24,48
48​
40.5​
57.5​
+6.5​
Zabriskie Point5315,28,50,23,32,49
50​
49.5​
66.5​
+13.5​
Mini Mac5536,33,30,44,31,22
44​
40.0​
57.0​
+2.0​
Coulsty Exchange500,8,18,0,19
19​
18.5​
35.5​
-14.5​
Little Beck Annie5428,16,23,34,37,24
37​
35.5​
52.5​
-1.5​
Diligent Henry4621,25,7,33,21,20
33​
29.0​
46.0​
0.0​
Bad Habits5529,50,39,18,40,35
50​
45.0​
62.0​
+7.0​
Blackjack5521,39,8,33,25,36
39​
37.5​
54.5​
-0.5​
Tilsworth Max5035,31,19,24,18,23
35​
33.0​
50.0​
0.0​
Mickey Mongoose4720,29,0,3,21,28
29​
28.5​
45.5​
-1.5​
Sanditon5224,37,22,0,27,24
37​
32.0​
49.0​
-3.0​
She's A Goldigger4612,11,17,29,18,34
34​
31.5​
48.5​
+2.5​
Regal Guest4612,20,0,10,0,5
20​
16.0​
33.0​
-13.0​

Ranked by Best Flat MR (Descending)​

Rank​
Horse
Best MR​
Best 2 Avg​
OR​
MR+17​
Diff​
1=​
Zabriskie Point
50​
49.5​
53​
66.5​
+13.5​
1=​
Bad Habits
50​
45.0​
55​
62.0​
+7.0​
3​
Ardaddy
48​
40.5​
51​
57.5​
+6.5​
4​
Mini Mac
44​
40.0​
55​
57.0​
+2.0​
5​
Blackjack
39​
37.5​
55​
54.5​
-0.5​
6=​
Little Beck Annie
37​
35.5​
54​
52.5​
-1.5​
6=​
Sanditon
37​
32.0​
52​
49.0​
-3.0​
8​
Tilsworth Max
35​
33.0​
50​
50.0​
0.0​
9​
She's A Goldigger
34​
31.5​
46​
48.5​
+2.5​
10​
Diligent Henry
33​
29.0​
46​
46.0​
0.0​
11​
Mickey Mongoose
29​
28.5​
47​
45.5​
-1.5​
12​
Regal Guest
20​
16.0​
46​
33.0​
-13.0​
13​
Coulsty Exchange
19​
18.5​
50​
35.5​
-14.5​

Flat MR Value View​

Most positively treated on your (Best 2 MR Avg +17) vs OR method:
  1. Zabriskie Point (+13.5)
  2. Bad Habits (+7.0)
  3. Ardaddy (+6.5)
  4. She's A Goldigger (+2.5)
  5. Mini Mac (+2.0)
Purely on the Flat MR model, the race looks much tighter than the market suggests, with Zabriskie Point, Bad Habits and Ardaddy rating particularly well against their ORs, while Coulsty Exchange is the weakest on the figures despite being relatively prominent in the betting.
 
It might be the case that MINI MAC has made great improvement since moving to Owens yard but the odds look a bit ridiculous to me now.
I see he ran over c/d in feb off a mark of 64 and was last of 12, now goes off 55 after a comfortable win at wolves so i don't think it looks that straightforward or worthy of even money.
BAD HABITS has gone out to as high as 40.0 so might not be a trier but he's down in grade and shown he's capable of winning 3 runs back, he should be fitter after a 139 days off before his lto run and would sooner risk a bit ew on him that the fav.
 
Can you not do it as it is - the problem with a vote is members may be just inclined to tick a box with reasoning shown
As it is had lots of different format from people inputs, some just put their ratings up which often are images. If people agree to head their post with Selection is Frankel then yes as it is could be scraped and processed. At the moment just want to get a feel if people would like some data analysis of the input's. There would be no naming and shaming, the process would simply take the inputs and attempt to find profitable patterns
 
As it is had lots of different format from people inputs, some just put their ratings up which often are images. If people agree to head their post with Selection is Frankel then yes as it is could be scraped and processed. At the moment just want to get a feel if people would like some data analysis of the input's. There would be no naming and shaming, the process would simply take the inputs and attempt to find profitable patterns
It's not straight forward to scrape this forum by the way.
 
As it is had lots of different format from people inputs, some just put their ratings up which often are images. If people agree to head their post with Selection is Frankel then yes as it is could be scraped and processed. At the moment just want to get a feel if people would like some data analysis of the input's. There would be no naming and shaming, the process would simply take the inputs and attempt to find profitable patterns
Is that because you still want to do the Wisdom of The Crowd Research, might be difficult with a poll as some select 2 or 3 horses In a Book
 
As it is had lots of different format from people inputs, some just put their ratings up which often are images. If people agree to head their post with Selection is Frankel then yes as it is could be scraped and processed. At the moment just want to get a feel if people would like some data analysis of the input's. There would be no naming and shaming, the process would simply take the inputs and attempt to find profitable patterns
How do you analyse their input if it’s just a name - scraping I have idea ArkRoyal ArkRoyal needs to be consulted - but I have problem with some keeping score always bearing mind these races do offer the possibilty of Dutching (sorry ARAZI91 ARAZI91 Duuutcccchhhinggg its like someone dragging their finger nails over a black board)
 
How do you analyse their input if it’s just a name - scraping I have idea ArkRoyal ArkRoyal needs to be consulted - but I have problem with some keeping score always bearing mind these races do offer the possibilty of Dutching (sorry ARAZI91 ARAZI91 Duuutcccchhhinggg its like someone dragging their finger nails over a black board)
'just a name' do you mean the tipster or the horse ?
 
Selections (13 runners, so up to 3 picks):
  1. Mickey Mongoose. He’s a Southwell specialist with three handicap wins there, including this course and distance in May off a mark 2lb higher than today’s. His trainer is 2 from 4 in the last 14 days.
  2. Ardaddy. He won over this course and distance last October, and he’s now 4lb lower and 2lb lighter. I’ve lifted him on his connections: trainer Appleby is 5 from 24 and jockey Stott 6 from 35 in the last 14 days. He’s been off 201 days, but that matches his own pattern: the course-and-distance win came after 206 days off.
  3. Bad Habits. He’s effectively on his winning mark and weight after the 4-year-old allowance, and he’s placed in 4 of his 8 Southwell runs. Against him: he’s 0 from 8 there, and his jockey, Sullivan, is 0 from 13 in the last 14 days. The reserve is Diligent Henry: 4lb lower and 4lb lighter than his last win, with trainer and jockey both in form.
Passed over:
  • Sanditon fails stable health: his trainer, Johnston, is 0 from 30 and his jockey, Shepherd, 0 from 35 in the last 14 days.
  • Blackjack is 9, so the OR-management lens applies. His trainer has gone 139 days without a winner.
Lay check: the favourite, Mini Mac at 10/11, is inside our 2/1 threshold. He’s 0 from 4 at Southwell and was well beaten every time, which counts against him on a course-specialist track. He’s back two days after winning, carrying 10lb more than he won with. In his favour, his trainer and jockey have both had winners in the last two days.
 
Back
Top