Tufnel
Stallion
That certainly ties in with going up a long way in class and winning.HiTufnel
Re”In the Pegwell Bay letter VDW commented on the result with "The result makes it appear he is capable of winning again before long."
Perhaps he said that because the prize money of 22K would have pushed his ability rating higher than the ability ratings of the horses that he beat . Just a thought and not a definite conclusion
What I'm really saying with that situation though is that if Pegwell Bay dropped in class next time and it's suggested he needs key horse support which I just don't see how Dudie gives that support. But if he had been going up in class to likely better opposition he wouldn't need key horse support. Which doesn't sound logical to me.
Philodantes, who I think was clearly a bet VDW was shouting about in the corresponding letter, had already won a better class race at the distance in his last 3 runs from that season than the Goodwood race he was labelled a "good thing". But he had been only 6th LTO in a lower class than his win but still higher than Goodwood. It was also a new trip of 1m 4f and the way he ran described in the comments says he led over 2f out and basically faded beyond 1m 2f.
The winner in that race had not been 1st, 2nd or 3rd LTO but had been 4th as 9/4 2nd fav and the race had been just 4 days before winning at Royal Ascot. To my mind and I'm sure VDW would have likely seen it this way too, that was not a shock result at Ascot. Merely the result of the games trainers play when prepping for a big handicap race. Coupled with the fact Philodantes had the best form in the same way Pegwell Bay was said to in that example (though I think Philodantes was more clear cut the better form horse on a class basis), I think Philodantes is an example the shows rigid key horse considerations such as must have been 1st,2nd or 3rd in it's previous race and in the first 3 of the market don't hold up to scrutiny in the wider picture. Especially when you look at Love From Verona or Ekbalco.
That's how I see it anyway. Methodical processes have guidelines not rules.


