Chesham I am finding that certain people on here do not like their long held beliefs challenged even when data is presented that clearly brings their belief system into question. For example one poster was keen to find out if horses had proof of acting on the going when he would be financially better off seeking out horses that have no proof or indeed some evidence of not acting on the goingBeen out all day , excellent posts T tony spencer and also Totally agree that one can learn so much from posts thatARAZI91 has produced. Also like your good self he manages to put over his research and suggestions in a way that does not upset anyone.
![]()
What are difficult about interactions with me other than me pointing out someone is wrong with a bar chart. As for asking I would say anyone who posts on a forum like this including me is by definition asking for interaction. If they felt otherwise they would simply keep their beliefs and idea to themselves. I would say calling someone a moron because they pointed out a sample of 2 may not be sufficient to formulate an opinion is a difficult interactionPerhaps it’s the way that you challenge themMySportsAI . Just Saying
Most could just post on The Inner Sanctum part of the forum and avoid difficult interactions with you. But they must be ok as they still post on the OS part of the Forum. If you constantly challenge their beliefs, you may find that they stop posting on the OS Part of the forum . Perhaps you should ask them if they would like your advice, rather than just jump in with a lot of Bar Charts Etc.
I am pleased he has helped you that is the purpose of this forumMySportsAI,
I looked at your product on you tube and its very good.
But and this is the big But we are not all on the same level as you.
Im thick but i enjoy forecasting horse races many members have helped me in the past andChesham is one of them.