V
VanMan
I should perhaps have been more explicit in my reply to T Thomas. I don't have any problem seeing why Countdown won. He showed his 4yo level of ability with the win on 24/10/06 and on my ratings hinted that he had improved on that as a 5yo with his run on 18/05/07, confirming it on 22/06/07. Back over his last winning course and trip on 04/07/07, and with a realistic margin of improvement to find from that last win, he was the likely winner.
What puzzled me is that Countdown came into the 04/07/07 race with a very different profile to the other Flat selections dropping in class which Lee gave - in respect of key horse form. Key horse form seems to have been an important element of Lee's selections, actually whether they were rising or dropping in class, and was very much part of the post for whose whereabouts on the thread Thomas was asking. Still, as with VDW's selections, with commonalities clearly don't explain all.
I should perhaps have been more explicit in my reply to T Thomas. I don't have any problem seeing why Countdown won. He showed his 4yo level of ability with the win on 24/10/06 and on my ratings hinted that he had improved on that as a 5yo with his run on 18/05/07, confirming it on 22/06/07. Back over his last winning course and trip on 04/07/07, and with a realistic margin of improvement to find from that last win, he was the likely winner.
What puzzled me is that Countdown came into the 04/07/07 race with a very different profile to the other Flat selections dropping in class which Lee gave - in respect of key horse form. Key horse form seems to have been an important element of Lee's selections, actually whether they were rising or dropping in class, and was very much part of the post for whose whereabouts on the thread Thomas was asking. Still, as with VDW's selections, with commonalities clearly don't explain all.