newsboy at that time as i recall real name Bob Butchers

Good to know Bob made it to 94 and perhaps the two packs a day helped.The leverage system, the Barlow rating system, contest 1 now the mail has stopped, there are so manyHow many systems were based around SF, F, EW and Spotform, I think I still have some somewhere in a box
How many systems were based around SF, F, EW and Spotform, I think I still have some somewhere in a box
All the papers had their own ratings and spotform and computerman in the express and the 78 ratings in the mail and the star also had there own.A few I should imagine.
The EW prefix reminded me of a time when I was managing a betting office in the South West (Vickers). A customer copped a Lucky 15 (20p Win) with bonuses which came to £3500+. I used to put up both Daily Mirror and Daily Mail racing pages along with all the other stuff each day. The relief manager was also in the shop and went over to the display and came back with the new found knowledge that the four winners were all EW and Spotform combined.
He came in to collect in cash the next day, (none of this affordability bollox) and duly placed another bunch of Lucky 15's, and lo and behold, he has 3 winners all running on to a 10/1 poke that just got nabbed on the line. It would of yielded another £3k+ for sure, and yes they were all EW + Spotform combined.
I tried to check the reasoning behind these EW selection. There seemed to be a correlation with course trainer form that had a summary available to check %...etc No reason why they shouldn't be viable today in some shape or form.
One I remember that had a good run, was Newsboy+Bouverie+Spotform when the betting forecast was 3/1+. Not many qualifiers but there was some logic behind it.
There was also a book published over 10 years ago - Better Betting (Chris Forwood) ISBN 978-1-907324-09-3 that covered a process of using the Daily Mirror data.
There was also a book before that "Better Betting" - called "Winning Ways" 1976 - Sceptre Hodden & StroughtonA few I should imagine.
The EW prefix reminded me of a time when I was managing a betting office in the South West (Vickers). A customer copped a Lucky 15 (20p Win) with bonuses which came to £3500+. I used to put up both Daily Mirror and Daily Mail racing pages along with all the other stuff each day. The relief manager was also in the shop and went over to the display and came back with the new found knowledge that the four winners were all EW and Spotform combined.
He came in to collect in cash the next day, (none of this affordability bollox) and duly placed another bunch of Lucky 15's, and lo and behold, he has 3 winners all running on to a 10/1 poke that just got nabbed on the line. It would of yielded another £3k+ for sure, and yes they were all EW + Spotform combined.
I tried to check the reasoning behind these EW selection. There seemed to be a correlation with course trainer form that had a summary available to check %...etc No reason why they shouldn't be viable today in some shape or form.
One I remember that had a good run, was Newsboy+Bouverie+Spotform when the betting forecast was 3/1+. Not many qualifiers but there was some logic behind it.
There was also a book published over 10 years ago - Better Betting (Chris Forwood) ISBN 978-1-907324-09-3 that covered a process of using the Daily Mirror data.
but so are most handicapping/betting type booksStill have a copy (as i do with the majority of betting, gambling & horseracing books) and can post it up if anybody want's a look


)