A very weird "gamble".Best of luckMartinK. I'm on Azzuri too, so long as it can avoid the David Jeffreys 5-fold gamble.
![]()
'I've been thrown under the bus' - trainer remains puzzled as gamble falls flat
Trainer David Jeffreys says he feels like he "has been thrown under a bus" after a gamble on his five runners across three of Monday's cards ended in... Read Morewww.racingpost.com
Yeah. Sounds like bookies at their worst. We'll see what comes out from it.A very weird "gamble".
I'd be happy to try and chip in to helping make some systems or share any ideas J may have, not sure it will help but if you start it I will join inGreetings.
As you know I also use IF (in fact one of the 17 systems that IAN offers was created by me and exchanged for the other 16). I use some of these systems and others that I create and share in the forum for this purpose. And I can say that all the systems have fallen noticeably to the point of making a marginal profit.
I calculate a drop in winners of between 8 and 9%.
We will have to see how things evolve now that the systems for Flat come into play.
Perhaps we should create a working group to investigate further.
On the other hand, on the systems and the benefits in one class and another.
Create a system that has only paid off since 2018 on Chase Class 4.
Another that had given benefits for AW in classes 4 and 6 has only given benefits this year for class 6
This is my reflection on this month. I hope things improve!
Why classes 4 and 6 historically and not class 5?Another that had given benefits for AW in classes 4 and 6 has only given benefits this year for class 6
Well, thanks to your reply, I reinvestigated the classes. Class 5 gave since 2018 losses in SP and 11 points in BSP (if I remove 2018 the thing improves and this year it has been positive).Why classes 4 and 6 historically and not class 5?
or classes 1-3 for that matter?
There may be valid reasons but surely if you’re just cherry picking certain areas without valid reason it is backfitting and would be unlikely to hold up going forward?



Until a week ago, my systems would collectively throw up about 4 selections a day on average. Now it's half that -- about 2 a day. I think it's simply because we're approaching the flat season, and the jumps are winding down: poor quality racing that's a bad betting medium.... all the systems have fallen noticeably to the point of making a marginal profit. I calculate a drop in winners of between 8 and 9%.
Yes, there's always change, but Ian's speed figures simply record speeds which have been achieved by every horse running. If someone devises a system based on Ian's ratings, they're on firm ground so long as the devised system relies on sensible factors. For instance, if a system is based on whether a horse did well at a given course and at a particular distance, it won't go far wrong if underpinned by good speed figures.... after ten years or less, many races are contested by completely different animals. Besides major changes in the participants ( horses, jockeys, trainers), times have moved on and there is always change.
Yes, it's extremely interesting why systems seem to fade with time, and, according to the data, have variable results in differing classes.
All hypotheses welcome. I have no idea myself.
It should be pointed out, perhaps, that Ian's systems have faced rigorous tests, checks and balances etc, but,
like it used to be said in the frenzied property boom in Thatcher's time:
"Past performance is no guarantee of future performance". Prices can go up and down.
I would also add - based on elementary stuff from A. Massey's stuff - after ten years or less, many races are contested by completely different animals.
Besides major changes in the participants ( horses, jockeys, trainers), times have moved on and there is always change.
Maybe every thing has its day?
Constants in life are few and far between. If they exist at all, they are often in the realm of abstract theory.
In reality, we, and our homes, and our transport generally decline. In our case, we blossom, bloom, fade away and die.
Ain't no golden rule that says systems won't do the same? Or, is there???
I've been searching all my life and, in conclusion, I still don't really know.
All the very best!