thanksChesham amazing strike rate
my criteria would be
age =4
career runs <8
OR >96
odds <10
days since run >120
career wins 2 or 3
im guessing it would pick up the fancied winners I mentioned on the other thread and also Ballet Concerto who missed out narrowly from running and won the consolation Spring Mile, but maybe plenty of losers , I don’t know, no longer subscribe to HRB so no idea
Yes definitely a horse called Ocean Tempest won after running in Meydan want to say 9 or 10 years ago, might be a couple more.I mentioned elsewhere whe LB ran that the last winner who actually had a run this year was back in 2007.
there is a chance Meydan runners have hasd soe success, as it's not covered by HRB
Trends
Age – 9 of the last 11 winners were aged 4 or 5
Price – 1 of the 11 winners were favourites, 3/11 winners were in the top 3 in the betting, 7/11 winners were priced 12/1 or bigger
Weight – 9 of the last 11 winners carried between 8st 12lbs and 9st 4lbs
Last Run – 4/11 winners won on their last run before the Lincoln Handicap, 9/11 winners had their last run 135 or more days ago
Previous Course Form – 4/11 winners had at least 1 previous run at Doncaster, 2/11 winners had at least 1 previous win at Doncaster
Previous Distance Form – 10/11 winners had at least 2 previous runs over 8 furlongs, 9/11 winners had at least 1 previous win over 8 furlongs
Previous Flat Form – 10/11 winners had at least 5 previous flat runs, 9/11 winners had at least 3 previous flat wins
Rating – 9/11 winners had a rating of between 94 and 102
Group Wins – 0/11 winners had at least 1 win in a group 1-3 race
Season Form – 3/11 winners had at least 1 run that season, 0/11 winners had at least 1 win that season
T tacker I think it's just a different way people like to narrow the field, not saying it's right or wrong but, they're trends for a reason meaning they happen again and again. You can interpret them the same way others do stats, make them tell you whatever you want, 10 of the last 10 winners had 4 legs. As you mentioned plenty of people do use the trends, it's probably a good starting point to discount some of the field IMO.Sullybomb , Very often members of this forum point to trends like the ones you list and appear happy enough to accept the numbers and assume they have meaning, maybe they do but this game takes a lot of hard work and personally some of these trends don't work for me.
Let's just rely on the first one AGE ?.....9 of the last 11 winners were aged 4 or 5 ?
So is this a very solid "trend" or simply reflecting the average age of a class 2 handicap so early in the season.
As with any handicap we're probably looking for a horse " well in " and i would have thought the chances are a 4yr old is more likely to have improvement in him/her than a 5yr old and so on with 6 & 7yr olds
The logic here then is what might have been a decent enough 3yr old last season becomes that unexposed 4yr old that might very well have pounds in hand, you can probably extend that to 5yr olds, again this being very early in the turf season.
It might then follow that the field for the average lincoln has a tendency to attract the 4yr olds and similar for the 5yr olds etc ?
This doesn't negate the trend by itself but maybe it dilutes the apparant strength behind the numbers, if most of the field fit into that bracket of 4-7 we surely need to balance that out when pointing to the 9 from 11 ?
A quick glance at today's field and i think i've counted 19 out of the 22 that fit into the 4-7 age bracket today, you will be pleased to know that i haven't looked at the other trends.
ps....This chap BEN AITKEN likes these trends if anyone interested, i tend not to bother.
![]()
Analysis & Tips for Doncaster Lincoln Day | Saturday 28th March - The Racing Podblast
Ben Aitken - www.narrowingthefield.co.uk - and Tony McCormick - talkSPORT & talkSPORT 2 - head to the opening day of the 2026 Flat season this weekend, with Doncaster and The Lincoln Handicap the main focus...Saturday (28th March)⭕ 1.50 D...www.buzzsprout.com



| Horse | Bowers Rtg | PR% (Last 3) | CCR (Last 3: Most Recent) | TFR | Tfig | RaceIQ Data / Integrated Comments (Most Recent First) |
| La Botte | 3.5 | 90%, 96%, 60% | 117.8, 94.5, 92.2 | 113, 113, 99 | 110, 87, 99 | RaceIQ: Elite closing sectionals. 1. Heavily restrained... headway out extremely wide... closing all the time. 2. Unlucky loser... interference entering final 1f halted momentum. 3. Raced wide, tracked pace, challenged 2f out, no extra. |
| 13.0 | 100%, 100%, 100% | 111.0, 92.0, 81.0 | 108, 99, 76 | 101, 84, 19 | RaceIQ: Sustained high top speed. 1. Mid-field, headway... quickened to lead final 1f, won readily. 2. Headway under 2f out, led over 1f out... found extra. 3. Made all... asserted final 1f under hands-and-heels ride. | |
| Botanical (IRE) | 16.0 | 35%, 20%, 50% | 111.2, 101.6, 102.4 | 106, 107, 108 | 107, 101, 81 | RaceIQ: High early exertion rates. 1. Tracked pace, led briefly over 2f out, weakened entering final 1f. 2. Tracked pace, effort under 3f out, hung left... faded. 3. Led first 3f, ridden out wide 2f out, no extra last ½f. |
| Shout (IRE) | 17.0 | 85%, 100%, 50% | 102.2, 103.0, 82.6 | 107, 108, 94 | 87, 107, 76 | RaceIQ: Elite late progression. 1. Slowly into stride... driven under 2f out, kept on. 2. Smooth headway over 2f out, produced to lead over 1f out, ridden out. 3. Dropped out, shaken up out wide... steady progress. |
| Rogue Diplomat (IRE) | 21.0 | 100%, 100%, 100% | 104.0, 96.0, 95.0 | 103, 103, 96 | 71, 96, 86 | RaceIQ: 1st for Average Stride Length. 1. Mid-field, headway 2f out, led final 1f, kept on, just held on. 2. Towards rear, pushed along and headway over 2f out... lead closing stages. 3. Waited with, quickened to lead under 2f out... ridden out. |
| Anno Domini | 22.0 | 30%, 20%, 60% | 99.7, 95.9, 112.8 | 102, 100, 103 | -, -, 79 | RaceIQ: Solid finishing speed. 1. Soon steadied, effort out wide entering straight, never nearer. 2. Slowly into stride, waited with, headway on inner over 1f out. 3. Held up... headway over 1f out, ran on, nearest at the finish. |
| Valvano (IRE) | 28.0 | 75%, 70%, 0% | 115.7, 117.1, -20.0 | 104, 105, - | 93, 57, - | RaceIQ: Vulnerable to traffic. 1. Squeeze through a tight gap and made rapid headway... headed. 2. Raced freely, going well when denied a run over 1f out... ran on. 3. Forced pace, headed over 3f out, stopped quickly. |
| Urban Lion | 31.0 | 55%, 20%, 75% | 83.8, 95.1, 119.7 | 94, 96, 108 | 83, 85, 94 | RaceIQ: Fades under late pressure. 1. Handy, shuffled back soon after halfway... stayed on one pace. 2. Prominent, led briefly 2f out, no extra final 1f. 3. Led, shaken up around 2f out, headed over 1f out, stuck to task. |
| Galeron (IRE) | 31.0 | 90%, 75%, 82% | 114.5, 93.6, 99.3 | 104, 97, 101 | 92, 87, 96 | RaceIQ: Consistent closing sectionals. 1. Reared leaving stalls... had to wait for gap 2f out... finished well. 2. Raced off the pace... headway out wide over 1f out, responded well. 3. Smooth headway over 2f out, every chance under 2f out, left behind. |
| Orandi (FR) | 32.0 | 10%, 5%, 65% | 59.2, 60.5, 84.8 | 57, 41, 96 | 44, 18, 76 | RaceIQ: Dropping performance metrics. 1. Raced off the pace, still plenty to do under 2f out, never better than mid-field. 2. Close up, lost place before halfway, shuffled back towards rear. 3. Broke well, settled in touch, ridden 2f out, one paced. |
FWIW T tacker , my three against the field are:Yes i very much agreeSullybomb it is all about opinions and that's what forums are about or used to be, not so much now.
My intention wasn't just to knock trends per se but to point out that when you scrutinise the numbers further they tend not to look that strong imo.
, as was.