mtoto
Gelding
Aint 1:00 1 Lamb Or Cod 2 Party Rock 3 Capellanus
Sand 1:20 1 Drum Valley 2 Bourne 3 Oscar Magic
Chep 2:00 1 Quartz De Thaix 2 Triptico 3 Mountainous
Aint 2:05 1 Walkon 2 Roberto Goldback 3 Storm Survivor
Sand 2:25 1 Specialagent Alfie 2 Radmores Revenge 3 Waterunder
Sand 3:00 1 Somersby 2 Captain Conan 3 Sire De Grugy
Aint 3:15 1 Quincy Des Pictons 2 Midnight Appeal 3 Plein Pouvoir.
It is all very well just posting up ratings, as ratings are only the first part of the puzzle, it is what we do or rather how we use the ratings that the important bit!! The thing I have noticed after joining this forum where several different sets of ratings are put up is although the ratings are formulated from different angles how often they agree. The only time there are any real serious differences is when the last race plays a major part ie the race was a none hcp now a hcp, horse didn't finish etc. The difference in selections seems to be down to the individual betting style of the person using them.
I look at my rating and the first thing I do is look at the prices on offer today the first race I cross out is Sand 3:00. the rating put up show the three most likely horses too win, but every/most agree so there is no real value to be had. I then have a quick look to see if any of the three are stand out as not being selected by the betting and see if I agree with the possible reason for the horse being ignored. If I can see the reason and agree I cross that horse out, however at times the only reason I can see are the well know reasons too much weight, poor/bad last run, stats, and sometimes just down to trainer/jockey not being fashionable, well known. In truth these are the horses I'm looking for, and more so now as I can see my class rating isn't a one off and often other methods still show/confirm my rating. So I'm left with a class horse that shows well in the ratings but that at times is being ignored for no real logical reason other than some preconceived ideas.
1:00 two horses with proven form in higher class both failed in their last race, one trained by a not so well known name. Both reasonable prices, so some would make a book. However that's not how I like to work so I try to find a logical way of splitting the two. Ones best form has been shown on undulating courses, Lamb Or Cod. The other has shown his best form on this course, Party Rock. For me this gives the advantage to PR, so is this a race he is going to be trying to win? The course and going look ok, this is a drop in class from last run, change of jockey reducing weight but with winning experience on horse. At around 18/1 for the win and 7/2 the place it is the sort of bet I;m looking for.
Other horses I'm interested in today are 2:00 Quartz De Thaix 2:25 Specialagent Alfie, and 3:15 Quincy Des Pictons.
All have proven form in higher class and all are much bigger prices than I think they should be.
Be Lucky
Sand 1:20 1 Drum Valley 2 Bourne 3 Oscar Magic
Chep 2:00 1 Quartz De Thaix 2 Triptico 3 Mountainous
Aint 2:05 1 Walkon 2 Roberto Goldback 3 Storm Survivor
Sand 2:25 1 Specialagent Alfie 2 Radmores Revenge 3 Waterunder
Sand 3:00 1 Somersby 2 Captain Conan 3 Sire De Grugy
Aint 3:15 1 Quincy Des Pictons 2 Midnight Appeal 3 Plein Pouvoir.
It is all very well just posting up ratings, as ratings are only the first part of the puzzle, it is what we do or rather how we use the ratings that the important bit!! The thing I have noticed after joining this forum where several different sets of ratings are put up is although the ratings are formulated from different angles how often they agree. The only time there are any real serious differences is when the last race plays a major part ie the race was a none hcp now a hcp, horse didn't finish etc. The difference in selections seems to be down to the individual betting style of the person using them.
I look at my rating and the first thing I do is look at the prices on offer today the first race I cross out is Sand 3:00. the rating put up show the three most likely horses too win, but every/most agree so there is no real value to be had. I then have a quick look to see if any of the three are stand out as not being selected by the betting and see if I agree with the possible reason for the horse being ignored. If I can see the reason and agree I cross that horse out, however at times the only reason I can see are the well know reasons too much weight, poor/bad last run, stats, and sometimes just down to trainer/jockey not being fashionable, well known. In truth these are the horses I'm looking for, and more so now as I can see my class rating isn't a one off and often other methods still show/confirm my rating. So I'm left with a class horse that shows well in the ratings but that at times is being ignored for no real logical reason other than some preconceived ideas.
1:00 two horses with proven form in higher class both failed in their last race, one trained by a not so well known name. Both reasonable prices, so some would make a book. However that's not how I like to work so I try to find a logical way of splitting the two. Ones best form has been shown on undulating courses, Lamb Or Cod. The other has shown his best form on this course, Party Rock. For me this gives the advantage to PR, so is this a race he is going to be trying to win? The course and going look ok, this is a drop in class from last run, change of jockey reducing weight but with winning experience on horse. At around 18/1 for the win and 7/2 the place it is the sort of bet I;m looking for.
Other horses I'm interested in today are 2:00 Quartz De Thaix 2:25 Specialagent Alfie, and 3:15 Quincy Des Pictons.
All have proven form in higher class and all are much bigger prices than I think they should be.
Be Lucky





but they (the birthdays) seem to be coming round faster each year and it gets a little frightening. So I don't like to talk about them 