It's a numbers game

[SilverBlaze]

2.25 pts win only. SAW. No bet if SP less than 5/1.

Day 25 of 30

1.57 - Chepstow - THE TWO AMIGOS
3.35 - Sandown - NICKOLSON

 

[SilverBlaze]

2.25 pts win only. SAW. No bet if SP less than 5/1.

Day 25 of 30

1.57 - Chepstow - THE TWO AMIGOS - 2nd 9/2
3.35 - Sandown - NICKOLSON - Lost @ 18/1

Staking plan: - 29.13 points
Level: - 16.50 points
Level [all bets - no price limit] - 1.72 points

 

[SilverBlaze]

2.25 pts win only. SAW. No bet if SP less than 5/1.

Day 26 of 30

2.15 - Musselburgh - WEATHER FRONT
5.20 - Wolverhampton - RICHARD R H B

 

[SilverBlaze]

2.25 pts win only. SAW. No bet if SP less than 5/1.

Day 26 of 30

2.15 - Musselburgh - WEATHER FRONT - Lost @ 4/1
5.20 - Wolverhampton - RICHARD R H B - Won @ 13/2

Staking plan: - 14.50 points
Level: - 10 points
Level [all bets - no price limit] + 3.78 points

 

[SilverBlaze]

2 pts win only. SAW. No bet if SP less than 5/1.

Day 27 of 30

3.38 - Fontwell - CRISTAL SPIRIT
4.15 - Southwell - SAMOVAR

 

[SilverBlaze]

2 pts win only. SAW. No bet if SP less than 5/1.

Day 27 of 30

3.38 - Fontwell - CRISTAL SPIRIT - Won @ 11/10
4.15 - Southwell - SAMOVAR - 3rd @ 15/2

Staking plan: - 16.50 points
Level: - 11 points
Level [all bets - no price limit] + 4.88 points

Quote Reply
Report

 

[markfinn]

Staking plan: - 16.50 points
Level: - 11 points
Level [all bets - no price limit] + 4.88 points

after month still in the black got to be doing something right

 

[SilverBlaze]

after month still in the black got to be doing something right

Thanks, Mark. Just three more betting days to complete the test. I've explored the theory before, and it does produce some good priced winners. However, it's still very much a work in progress.

 

[SilverBlaze]

2 pts win only. SAW. No bet if SP less than 5/1.

Day 28 of 30

3.02 - Warwick - MANOFTHEMOMENT
5.00 - Chelmsford - IRISH TIMES
5.30 - Chelmsford - ELZAAM'S DREAM
6.00 - Chelmsford - PLANTADREAM

 

[SilverBlaze]

2 pts win only. SAW. No bet if SP less than 5/1.

Day 28 of 30

3.02 - Warwick - MANOFTHEMOMENT - Lost @ 15\2
5.00 - Chelmsford - IRISH TIMES - 3rd @ 6\1
5.30 - Chelmsford - ELZAAM'S DREAM - Lost @ 5\2
6.00 - Chelmsford - PLANTADREAM - Lost @ 2\1

Staking plan: - 20.50 points
Level: - 13 points
Level [all bets - no price limit] + 0.88 points

 

[SilverBlaze]

2 pts win only. No bet if SP less than 5/1.

Day 29 of 30

7.45 - Wolverhampton - TATHMEEN

 

[SilverBlaze]

2 pts win only. No bet if SP less than 5/1.

Day 29 of 30

7.45 - Wolverhampton - TATHMEEN - Lost @ 7\1

Staking plan: - 22.50 points
Level: - 14 points
Level [all bets - no price limit] - 0.12 points

Quote Reply
Report

 

[SilverBlaze]

2 pts win only. SAW. No bet if SP less than 5/1.

Day 30 of 30

1.45 - Lingfield - NEWYORKSTATEOFMIND
2.50 - Lingfield - GOLD STANDARD

 

[SilverBlaze]

2 pts win only. SAW. No bet if SP less than 5/1.

Day 30 of 30

1.45 - Lingfield - NEWYORKSTATEOFMIND - Lost @ 11\4
2.50 - Lingfield - GOLD STANDARD - Won @ 5\2

Staking plan: - 22.50 points
Level: - 14 points
Level [all bets - no price limit] + 1.38 points

That concludes the short test period. Not a disaster, but not enough to suggest it's worth continuing with the trial.

 

[pete]

Well done on completing a full 30 day test with profit/loss. Too many people abandon these too soon or do not show profit/loss when testing. You are to be commended for seeing this through to the end. Though I have a personal dislike of any system or method that stipulate a price limit on qualifiers, you stuck with it, so fair play and well done.

 

[retriever]

Though I have a personal dislike of any system or method that stipulate a price limit on qualifiers

And doesn't this thread add weight to that 'no price limit' preference by coming out the best at +1.38pts

 

[SilverBlaze]

Well done on completing a full 30 day test with profit/loss. Too many people abandon these too soon or do not show profit/loss when testing. You are to be commended for seeing this through to the end. Though I have a personal dislike of any system or method that stipulate a price limit on qualifiers, you stuck with it, so fair play and well done.

Thanks, Pete. I also dislike the limiting of price, but I decided to apply the filter just as an experiment.

 

[SilverBlaze]

And doesn't this thread add weight to that 'no price limit' preference by coming out the best at +1.38pts

Absolutely, Retriever. Many thanks for your interest.