cosmicsports
Colt
This is a question for experts.
I asked it before but maybe was not understood.
Suppose you are an expert forecast bettor.
For every race you propose to us one forecast bet, say the AB.
There are the following possibilities:
A wins, B finishes second - it's a bingo
A wins, B fails to finish second - loss
A fails to win, B finishes second - loss
A fails to win, B does n't finish second - loss
Now as you see the first two cases where you got the winner is the same as if you were giving us win bets.
So let's suppose your score is an honourable 1 out of 4 for the winners.
What will happen with the forecasts ?
Should be 1 out of 16, should n't it ? Or perhaps a bit more because to predict "A" you have to deal with the entire field, but to predict "B" you have to deal with the field minus one.
But evertyime I do this kind of scorekeeping I find less than that.
Less than (strike rate for winners)^2 that is.
Is this a general trait I wonder ?
I asked it before but maybe was not understood.
Suppose you are an expert forecast bettor.
For every race you propose to us one forecast bet, say the AB.
There are the following possibilities:
A wins, B finishes second - it's a bingo
A wins, B fails to finish second - loss
A fails to win, B finishes second - loss
A fails to win, B does n't finish second - loss
Now as you see the first two cases where you got the winner is the same as if you were giving us win bets.
So let's suppose your score is an honourable 1 out of 4 for the winners.
What will happen with the forecasts ?
Should be 1 out of 16, should n't it ? Or perhaps a bit more because to predict "A" you have to deal with the entire field, but to predict "B" you have to deal with the field minus one.
But evertyime I do this kind of scorekeeping I find less than that.
Less than (strike rate for winners)^2 that is.
Is this a general trait I wonder ?