• Hi Guest Just in case you were not aware I wanted to highlight that you can now get a free 7 day trial of Horseracebase here.
    We have a lot of members who are existing users of Horseracebase so help is always available if needed, as well as dedicated section of the fourm here.
    Best Wishes
    AR

Handicap Class Droppers

Tufnel

Stallion
It's fairly well known situation that a significant percentage of handicap races are won by horses dropped from another handicap race worth more money to the winner.

But how does that work out on an individual trainer basis. After all, there's quite a range of trainers in both their skill and resources.

I ran the numbers on Andrew Balding. A very good trainer especially with handicappers and one I've personally found a decent amount of winners from his runners in the last few years.

From 2018 until the end of 2023 his runners that were dropped from a higher value handicap race to a lower one showed he had 1,008 runners dropped and 143 winners or 14.2%.

And 41% of his runners were actually dropped in race prize (class) next time out.

But for 2024 and 2025 his strike rate went up to 20.5% with 85 such winners from 414 runners and just 40.2 % runners being dropped. You'd also have made a whopping 5 pts from backing them all blind.

Surely this is down to him having better horses now, not just his skill as a trainer, excellent as it is.

If we compare him to another handicap king William Haggas, who's obviously been training a lot longer than Andrew, it's interesting.
2018 - 26 from 101 at 25.7% and LSP +25.7 points 39.8% of runners dropped.
2019 - 47 from 197 at 23.9% and LSP +14.7 points 39.1% dropped.
2020 - 14 from 79 at 17.7% and LSP +2.7 points 34.7 % dropped. (Some sort of crazy stay at home craze swept the country this year)
2021 - 19 from 80 at 23.7% and LSP +22.5 points just 27.3% dropped.
2022 - 23 from 98 at 23.5% and LSP -15.9 points 33% dropped.
2023 to 2025 - 70 from 345 at 20.3% and LSP -7.1 points 38.9% dropped.

There's been a definite decline in the success of Haggas horses dropping in class. Or to be more precise, the rate has gone down by about 15% of what it was, but also the prices of the winners has been reduced eroding any profits into losses.

But here's an interesting stat. The Haggas stable between 2018 and 2023 had a 16.7% strike rate for handicappers going UP in prize money from one handicap to another showing a 152 point loss from 111 winner out of 663 runners. But in 2024 and 2025 they had a 25% strike rate with 63 winners from 251 runners and a LSP in both years totally 59.1 points.

Where as Balding has had a 12.3% strike rate for such horses since 2018 to 2025 with a big -375.8 point loss.

Conclusion has to be that success or otherwise for trainers largely depends on what ammo they have in their yard, but if they have the right candidate both these yards know pretty much what they're doing.
 
Here's a stat regarding Jim Goldie. From 2021 to 2025 his handicap class droppers who had been 2nd LTO won 24 times from 81 runners SR 29.6% LSP +31.8 and he only dropped such horses in 30.2% of race.

His LTO winners dropping also won over 25% of the time but made a small loss.

Or how about George Boughey with a lifetime training stat of 29 winners from 66 handicap class droppers who won LTO which is 43.9% and an LSP of +26.3 from just 20.4% of his race entries for handicaps doing so.

Same trainer's LTO 2nds dropping show 23 wins from 74 runners 31.1% and LSP +21.5
 
In the Goodwood 2:35 there are several class droppers including the currently 9/4 fav and winner of the race last year Flash Harry from a pound lower rating

But Cox runners have a modest 13.6 % strike rate on handicap class droppers and that seems consistent across the full range of LTO finishing positions.

The horse has been running in better races, perhaps being aimed at this long term, but conditions are very different today. The only run on soft ground was in better class but down the field so not conclusive.

There are some other trainers in here though that have better strike rates for class droppers the further they finished down the field last time out. Richard Hannon is one of those, where the strike rate goes into the 20+% area.

I'm going to make a 4 horse book here, all class droppers like the fav, but 3 of them have a form connection.

Toyotomi, Rappers Delight, Fandom and Sudden Flight. At these sort of prices I can get better than likely SP on exchanges and hopefully the fav doesn't prove to be up to the task on the going.
 
Well the trainer with the worst class dropping strike rate provided the winner with the fav winning well and the ground clearly not a bother to him.

Just goes to show stats can lead you down the wrong path. The horse taking the biggest drop in class, dropped in the weights and a pound lower than winning the same race last year took the spoils.

I think this yet another lesson for me that nothing is set in stone for many things in racing. Each case has to be taken on it's own merits. The horse itself is the most important element. What trainers did with other horses who could be stones apart in ability is irrelevant.

That observation is why so many of the trainer stats fluctuate year to year. It depends on the ability of the horses they have in their care as to if they can repeat successful training schedules again.
 
Sedgefield 3:45
I see Zamond as a qualifier on the Handicap Hurdle method. Whilst not all of those were class droppers, Zamond fits the profile of those near the head of the weights who did drop in class.

Obviously Mr Mullins has sent over one who might just go out and destroy the field, but it doesn't fit any of the factors I've researched on the method.

Zamond is a bet for me.
 
Sedgefield 3:45
I see Zamond as a qualifier on the Handicap Hurdle method. Whilst not all of those were class droppers, Zamond fits the profile of those near the head of the weights who did drop in class.

Obviously Mr Mullins has sent over one who might just go out and destroy the field, but it doesn't fit any of the factors I've researched on the method.

Zamond is a bet for me.
Patrick Mullins is trying to have at least one winner at every track and he has not ridden at sedgefield before
 
The 2:48 Hexham has a field where none of them have one of the factors I think was involved in the Handicap Hurdle method VDW gave six examples of. It may be it's not a definite requirement but it existed in all six examples.

If you leave that factor to the side then the only 2 to consider are Mr Mcloughlan and Moveit Like Minnie. And on the other factors I think were involved, Mr Mcloughlan would be the one to side with. Not much of a price, so I think I'll leave it given the missing factor they all have today.
 
In the 3:23 horses who do have all the factors in place are Glory and Honour and Ballynoe Boy.

3:58 Scottish Dancer has the most in favour, apart from one little issue I'm not sure about yet with the method regarding those with top weights.
 
Back
Top