• Hi Guest Just in case you were not aware I wanted to highlight that you can now get a free 7 day trial of Horseracebase here.
    We have a lot of members who are existing users of Horseracebase so help is always available if needed, as well as dedicated section of the fourm here.
    Best Wishes
    AR

C'mon Leeds!

Nice analysis, Leodis.
This is the game that we’ve waited for to secure PL survival. Burnley are very poor, already relegated, and have nothing to play for. However, they always seem to turn up against Leeds and have beaten us twice and drawn once in our last three meetings. Surely Farke is going to take the restraints off and try to win this from the off. Elland Road on a Friday night, a pleasant evening, a full house of roaring fans, he’s got to go for it from kick off. I won’t bet on that happening, but ‘Come on you Whites!’. Never forget, we always do things the hard way.
 
Thanks M Monty ,

Yeh, on paper it’s a nailed-on 3‑pointer — but as you said, Burnley always make it awkward for us, and we don't want to be left still chasing points by the time Spurs and West Ham roll up. Let's make it easy for once!

Elland Road on a Friday will be rocking.
 
I see Burnley have turfed out Parker. Should have done it months ago. I don’t know what effect that will have on the players. As we know, it’s never easy for us, but you’re right Elland Road will be rocking come kick off. Let’s go for it!
 
The numbers lean towards a low scoring game and indicate some value in the 0-0, 1-0, 0-1 and match odds of a draw.

With Scott Parker leaving by mutual consent, that might de-motivate Burnley. If Leeds use an attacking strategy from the off, they could put the game away before half-time, so the numbers don't necessarily tell the full story.

1777612874511.png
1777613587279.png

1777613335605.png
 
If Leeds had used an attacking strategy from the off in most games we would have had many more points on the board than we currently have. Farke is far too cautious and I also don’t think Burnley will be demotivated by Parker going, I fear the opposite might apply.

Anyway, apart from that, what a beautifully presented assessment of the game that is, DuckandDive, thanks for that. It’s very interesting.
 
markfinn said:
its not a got to win - but we would all sleep easier if they can do it - hope Chelsea have not drained the tank to much , Calvert is all in needs a rest , 3 points tomorrow might allow that to happen
Click to expand...
It would certainly give Spurs more to do if we get the 3 points and make the weekend games more comfortable to watch :)

Monty said:
If Leeds had used an attacking strategy from the off in most games we would have had many more points on the board than we currently have. Farke is far too cautious and I also don’t think Burnley will be demotivated by Parker going, I fear the opposite might apply.

Anyway, apart from that, what a beautifully presented assessment of the game that is, DuckandDive, thanks for that. It’s very interesting.
Click to expand...

Yes, Farke has been praised for doing 'a good job', but we have been in the relegation battle-zone for most of the season. Thankfully, it has been an underperforming league this season for most teams and that has helped us.
 
Leodis said:
Yes, Farke has been praised for doing 'a good job', but we have
Click to expand...
Be careful what we wish for - he has done well with that squad and a limited budget (which I don’t see a negative) I would like to see table or graph produces end of season prediction of all clubs league positions based on spend and or even value of squad. Little point paying agents Millions of pounds to rob you blind leaving players sitting on their tanned arses bleeding the club dry - I hope Leeds have a good look round at the reality of finance before they do anything stupid - rather see the club bounce along than go skint aiming at Europe . We think we are big club but look at revenues and the new ground capacity - not that big.
 
Last edited:
I input within the fishy table calculator, Newcastle to lose their remaining games and finish on 42 pts. Does seem they'll just survive.

Football League Calculator


1777710708776.png

Main concern for Newcastle and any middle eastern backed premier team, is how the UAE see overseas sports investment in the next few years. (The Liv golf project has recently been pulled)
 
A nice win that!

Today's match report:

✅ Consolidated Match Analysis Table

Brentford vs West Ham United

CategoryBrentford (Home)West Ham United (Away)Comment / Interpretation
League Position9th17thBrentford are mid‑table stable; West Ham lower – relegation zone
League Points4836Seasonal base strength favours Brentford
Last 5 ResultsD–D–D–D–LD–L–W–D–WHome side stalls games; away side pushes outcomes
Wins / Draws / Losses0 / 4 / 12 / 2 / 1Draw frequency vs result generation
Goals For (last 5)57West Ham show better attacking output
Goals Against (last 5)64Defensive edge to West Ham
Goal Difference−1+3Momentum direction favours West Ham
Match Performance Level (MPL)4.258.52Away side gain more adjusted value
Goal Performance Rating (GPR)−0.40+1.20Sharp contrast in efficiency
Power Rating (MPL + GPR)3.859.72Strong overall edge to West Ham
Momentum DirectionLow / FlatStrong / UpwardStability vs acceleration
Home / Away BiasDraw‑heavy at homeProductive but mixed awayLow variance vs higher ceiling
Fair Odds – Win2.952.40Away side marginally favoured
Fair Odds – Draw3.20Draw structurally significant
Over / Under 2.52.10 / 1.72Goals expectation modest
BTTS – Yes / No1.80 / 2.05West Ham goals keep BTTS alive









✅ Correct Score – Fair Odds (Model)

Correct ScoreFair OddsComment / Interpretation
1–16.80Most consistent with Brentford draw profile + BTTS
1–2 (West Ham)8.50Away edge with controlled scoring
0–1 (West Ham)9.25If Brentford stagnate offensively
2–211.0Higher variance, draw scenario
1–0 (Brentford)10.5Requires Brentford over‑performance
0–012.0Structurally possible but low attacking value
Team Summary

Brentford (Home)

  • Strong at suppressing risk, weak at converting control into wins
  • Draw frequency directly influences correct‑score clustering (1–1, 0–0)
  • Negative efficiency metric limits upside outcomes
Analytical identity:

Floor‑raising team, ceiling‑limited - Their home matches consistently compress risk and outcomes, making them difficult to defeat but equally hard to back for wins.




West Ham United (Away)

  • Positive GPR indicates sharp finishing
  • Capable of winning narrow games and exploiting limited opposition creativity
  • Away performances fluctuate, but decisive moments appear
Analytical identity:

Volatility with direction - They are less stable than Brentford, but far more decisive when chances arise.




Match‑Level Analytical Summary (Non‑Predictive)

This match is mathematically defined by control vs conversion:

  • Brentford are likely to shape the game
  • West Ham are more likely to decide it
Probability mass concentrates around:

  • 1–1 (structural draw)
  • 1–2 / 0–1 (West Ham efficiency outcomes)
Quantitatively, West Ham hold the clearer short-term performance edge, while Brentford’s home traits keep the draw highly relevant.

This is a balanced but asymmetrical matchup, best understood as one where the away side owns the upside, while the home side controls the floor.
 
The Spurs game could be pivotal today, with West Ham falling short.

I have not done a match report, as we never really know which version of Spurs will be turning up for the event. Either way, It will be a difficult game for them and, if they manage a win then it's a little bit of pressure on Leeds for their next game. However, if Wham lose to Arsenal next (which is likely) then we are good for the remainder of the season.
 
I think we can relax, Leodis. I can’t see WHam beating Arsenal and, anyway, both they and Spurs are gutless. That’s the advantage we hold over both of them. We may be short in many areas but we don’t roll over as easily as those two. We’ve points in the bag. They don’t.
 
Well, Spurs were gifted the 3pts yesterday. I can understand Villa having higher priorities elsewhere, but at least turn up for the paying fans. The question is, have Spurs picked up remarkably or have they been flattered by the quality of their last two opponents? I guess we will find out, come our next game against them. Hopefully, by that time the Arse will have done the business on Wham - then I will relax, M Monty :)

Today's match report:

Consolidated Analysis​

CategoryChelseaNottm ForestComment
League Position9th16thChelsea higher, but misleading vs form
MPL0.0011.18Forest massively outperforming
GPR-4.40+4.40Extreme goal difference contrast
Power Rating-4.4015.58Huge gap (~19.98 pts)
Form Trend5 lossesUnbeaten (3W, 2D)Opposite momentum profiles
Home/Away BiasVery weak homeVery strong awayKey structural edge to Forest
Home/Away -fair oddsH: 5.80A: 1.55Away side strongly favoured
Draw Fair- OddsD: 4.20
BTTSYes: 2.80No: 1.45Chelsea unlikely to score
Top Scoreline0–26.50Most aligned with data
Alt Scoreline0–1 / 0–37.50 / 8.50Clean-sheet outcomes dominate
Outside Score1–210.00Requires Chelsea goal (low probability)

​

Match Summary​

This is a high-contrast fixture where league position and current performance strongly diverge.

Chelsea Summary
  • Form: Critically poor (5 straight losses)
  • Attack: 0 goals in last 5 → complete breakdown
  • Defence: Conceding consistently against strong sides
  • Home Performance: No advantage — actually a weakness

    Interpretation:
    Chelsea are operating at a level far below their league position, with no attacking output to stabilise results. Their metrics suggest low competitiveness in current state.

    Nottingham Forest Summary
    • Form: Strong and consistent (unbeaten run)
    • Attack: 13 goals in 5 games → high efficiency
    • Defence: Only 2 conceded → very stable
    • Away Performance: Exceptionally strong (dominant wins)

      Interpretation:

      Forest are performing well above their league position, combining:
    • Efficient scoring
    • Defensive solidity
    • Strong momentum
    • They enter this match with a clear structural and performance edge

The Power Rating gap (~19.98 points) is decisive and drives:
  • Strong bias toward the away win
  • Low probability of Chelsea scoring
  • Scoreline clustering around 0–2 / 0–3
Overall, this is a momentum-driven mismatch, not a balanced contest.

 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top