• Hi Guest Just in case you were not aware I wanted to highlight that you can now get a free 7 day trial of Horseracebase here.
    We have a lot of members who are existing users of Horseracebase so help is always available if needed, as well as dedicated section of the fourm here.
    Best Wishes
    AR

An Under 2.50 goals Adventure.

Delboy99 said:
TUESDAY 29th UNDER 2.50 GOALS:-
All Boys v Gimnasia Mendoza 171
Botafogo SP v ABC RN 187

Onwards and Upwards. ;)
Click to expand...
.... one right and one wrong in this venture. Scores as shown above.
3-1
0-0

Progressive total = 29 correct from 40 selections = 72.50% ;)
 
...... Picked some matches for Sunday but unfortunately forgot to post them. So they don't count and I ended up with 3 correct from 4, so the system is definitely looking at the right stats. ;)
 
UNDER 2.50 GOALS TUESDAY 5th.
Gimnasia Mendoza v Nueva Chicago 150
Deportivo Riestra v Chacarita Juniors 196
Bishops Stortford v Rushall 150
Hampton & Richmond v Weymouth 133
Tonbridge v Braintree 193

ONwards and Upwards. ;)
 
Delboy99 said:
UNDER 2.50 GOALS TUESDAY 5th.
Gimnasia Mendoza v Nueva Chicago 150
Deportivo Riestra v Chacarita Juniors 196
Bishops Stortford v Rushall 150
Hampton & Richmond v Weymouth 133
Tonbridge v Braintree 193

ONwards and Upwards. ;)
Click to expand...
..... results in this one not quite so good but satisfactory 3 correct from 5. Scores as printed above:-
2-1
0-1
1-4
1-0
0-0
Only one wobbler 1-4.
Progressive Total = 32 correct from 45 selections = 71.11% ;)
 
UNDER 2.50 GOALS MONDAY 11th.
Nueva Chicago v Patronato 196
Arsenal Tula v Khimki 163

Onwards and Upwards. ;)
 
UNDER 2.50 GOALS WEDNESDAY 13th.
Dungguan Guanlian v Yanbian Longding 191
Shanghai Jiading Hullong v Sichuan Jiuniu 193
Bala Town v TNS 134

Onwards and Upwards.:)
 
Delboy99 said:
UNDER 2.50 GOALS WEDNESDAY 13th.
Dungguan Guanlian v Yanbian Longding 191
Shanghai Jiading Hullong v Sichuan Jiuniu 193
Bala Town v TNS 134

Onwards and Upwards.:)
Click to expand...
.... not too bad, 2 correct from 3 selections. Scores as typed above.
1-1
1-3
0-0
Strange to see that the largest rating was the one that failed. Coincidence or not uhm!

Progressive winners to date 37 correct from 51 selections = 72.55% ;)
 
UNDER 2.50 GOALS FRIDAY 15th.
Deportivo Riestra v Atletico Atlanta 193
Liefering v Stripfing 167
St.Polten v First Vienna 166
Vila Nova v Ponte Preta 142

Onwards and Upwards. ;)
 
Delboy99 said:
UNDER 2.50 GOALS FRIDAY 15th.
Deportivo Riestra v Atletico Atlanta 193
Liefering v Stripfing 167
St.Polten v First Vienna 166
Vila Nova v Ponte Preta 142

Onwards and Upwards. ;)
Click to expand...
..... not that wonderful today, only 2 correct from 4 selections.
Scores as printed above.
1-0
1-2
1-2
1-1

Progressive winners to date 39 correct from 55 selections = 70.91% ;)
 
Tennis33 said:
How many units have been completed so far with your project?
Click to expand...
.... Don't fully understand your question. Since the birth of this system there have been 55 total selections and this resulted in 39 winners = 70.91% all currently paper bets which originated from an experiment. ;)
 
Deportivo Riestra v Atletico Atlanta 193 - 1:0 WON +0.93 Unit
Liefering v Stripfing 167 - 1:2 LOST -1 Unit
St.Polten v First Vienna 166 - 1:2 LOST -1 Unit
Vila Nova v Ponte Preta 142 - 1:1 WON +0.42 Unit

You have after this 4 matches: -0.65 Unit.

My question: How many units have been completed so far with your project?
 
Tennis33 said:
Deportivo Riestra v Atletico Atlanta 193 - 1:0 WON +0.93 Unit
Liefering v Stripfing 167 - 1:2 LOST -1 Unit
St.Polten v First Vienna 166 - 1:2 LOST -1 Unit
Vila Nova v Ponte Preta 142 - 1:1 WON +0.42 Unit

You have after this 4 matches: -0.65 Unit.

My question: How many units have been completed so far with your project?
Click to expand...
… the figures after each selection are not prices. If you look back at the start of the thread you will find that the likes of 193-167-166-142 are indeed rating figures which defines the strength of each selection and have nothing to do with odds. The lower the rating, supposed to give a better chance of being under 2.50 goals. Trust this gives you a better idea of the strengths of eac selection.;)
 
...... not been here for a while as I have been looking to change the selection method. Still experimenting with this but looking promising as although this new method is still in its infancy, i currently have 7 correct under 2.50 goals from 7 selections, not proofed but looking decent. Hope to be back shortly. ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top