• Hi Guest, The forum will be moving hosts on 26 July and as such will be closed from Midday until the move has completed.
    As we will be with new hosts it may take a while before DNS get updated so it could take while before you can get back on the forum.
    I think it will take at least 4 hours but could easily be 48!
    Ark Royal
  • There seems to be a problem with some alerts not being emailed to members. I have told the hosts and they are investigating.
  • Sorry for the ongoing issues that you may have been experiencing whilst using the forum lately

    It really is frustrating when the forum slows down or Server Error 500 pops up.

    Apparently the hosts acknowledge there is a problem.
    Thank you for using our services and sorry for the experienced delay!
    Unfortunately, these errors are due to a higher server load. Our senior department knows about the issue and they are working towards a permanent resolution of the issue, however, I'd advise you to consider using our new cPanel cloud solutions: https://www.tsohost.com/web-hosting


    I will have to investigate what the differences are with what We have know compared to the alternative service they want us to migrate to.
    Keep safe.
    AR

Yesteryear Correct Score System.

Delboy99

Mare
Todays Selections
.... HI Gary. Been noticing you beavering behind the scenes with these and you state that you are not getting very far with these. I think the whole problem is that these are a complete list of possible selections and as such provide far too big a target for you to control. I think what this really needs is an abreviated list of only your selections and how they perform each week. This way you will have percentage control of a list which will hopefully show more winners than losers and thus provide would be punters with some real guidance. If the list of losers gets bigger than the list of winners, then you would need to do some fine tuning in an endeavour to get better weekly results. Currently this is only a list of possible selections, so why not offer a target of say five selections out of the total and see how they go each week. ;)
 
.... HI Gary. Been noticing you beavering behind the scenes with these and you state that you are not getting very far with these. I think the whole problem is that these are a complete list of possible selections and as such provide far too big a target for you to control. I think what this really needs is an abreviated list of only your selections and how they perform each week. This way you will have percentage control of a list which will hopefully show more winners than losers and thus provide would be punters with some real guidance. If the list of losers gets bigger than the list of winners, then you would need to do some fine tuning in an endeavour to get better weekly results. Currently this is only a list of possible selections, so why not offer a target of say five selections out of the total and see how they go each week. ;)
Hi Delboy , that is a possibility as I give the list as probabilities and don,t do them all myself. Going forward I could give my best selections also whether it be 1 or 5 selections . It would be interesting to see how they do. Thanks for pointing this out as i think we all get blinkered trying to find the one system that could be the dogs bollocks. :lolsign:
 

Delboy99

Mare
... No problem, just did not want to jump on anyone's toes. There was a need here for to test your findings and not just to outline what the system indicated at what looked best. There was no way you could control what you were producing on your graphs. Hope this gives you the necessary spark. ;)
 

paulb164

Colt
Hi Delboy , that is a possibility as I give the list as probabilities and don,t do them all myself. Going forward I could give my best selections also whether it be 1 or 5 selections . It would be interesting to see how they do. Thanks for pointing this out as i think we all get blinkered trying to find the one system that could be the dogs bollocks. :lolsign:
Quite often less is more - it can all be well and good going for quantity over quality and play the game of winning more than you lose, but I have found that certain systems work better (i.e. more profitably) when you pick and choose the right bets. Look for ways to raise the win % even if it means reducing the picks and go from there (i.e. analyse and explore why they are winning instead of losing, and use that as a springboard to expand the picking criteria)
 

paulb164

Colt
Hi FHRTIPS FHRTIPS
Just wanted to ask if the systems behind your recommendations work with each other, or if they are independent ? I ask because, taking the example below;

1597547747441.png

it predicts either a home or away win (i.e. not a draw), and over 1.5 goals but under 2.5 goals (so, 2 goals in the game). It also says BTTS - yes, but with 2 goals that means a 1-1 draw which contradicts the 2-0/0-2 scoreline predicted ?
 

FHRTIPS

Filly
Hi FHRTIPS FHRTIPS
Just wanted to ask if the systems behind your recommendations work with each other, or if they are independent ? I ask because, taking the example below;

View attachment 87516

it predicts either a home or away win (i.e. not a draw), and over 1.5 goals but under 2.5 goals (so, 2 goals in the game). It also says BTTS - yes, but with 2 goals that means a 1-1 draw which contradicts the 2-0/0-2 scoreline predicted ?
Hi there are independent or you could say do a double with over 1.5 & btts bet or any combined really it's up to the bettor maybe a single bet on best value odds
 
Top