paulb164
Colt
I have just done the score checks on the next round of Belgian games, and one score prompted me to recheck the changes I made when I incorporated the Belgian and Argentinian leagues into the system. It showed that, despite my initial thoughts that I would get a more balanced score using 5 results instead of the system's 4, some returned scores were more exaggerated. The upcoming Antwerp v Mechelen game for instance using the original system returns a score of 6.5, but using the previous 5 results gave a score of 9 !
I now think that the bet decisions based on the rating score were designed for and should only use 4 results, and so I am reverting back to the 4 results per match - as the played rounds recorded for Belgium and Argentina were using wrong scores, I am going to remove them from the plan's records because they don't follow the plan, but will do so from now on. It only reflects 1 round of each league, and makes the existing results more accurate (as well as greatly improved !).
So, with that amendment done, and due to the fact that the system has just managed 11 straight wins to date, this is the correct plan p/l;
I now think that the bet decisions based on the rating score were designed for and should only use 4 results, and so I am reverting back to the 4 results per match - as the played rounds recorded for Belgium and Argentina were using wrong scores, I am going to remove them from the plan's records because they don't follow the plan, but will do so from now on. It only reflects 1 round of each league, and makes the existing results more accurate (as well as greatly improved !).
So, with that amendment done, and due to the fact that the system has just managed 11 straight wins to date, this is the correct plan p/l;