Ronald's Ratings

[Ronald Shaw]

Rp Std 6.40 Jack of Diamonds Win sp 14/1
My Std 7.10 Idol Deputy Win sp 7/2

Hi,

When looking at my uploaded file the selection is the highest rated on both RP STD and MY STD.
a very good day on Tuesday with a 14/1 and 7/2 winners at sp prices.

 

[Chesham]

Well done Ronald Shaw

 

[Ronald Shaw]

Well done Ronald Shaw

Cheers Chesham,

can you tell me is it better to give only the selections or continue uploading the file.

 

[Chesham]

Cheers Chesham,

can you tell me is it better to give only the selections or continue uploading the file.

Hi Ronald Shaw

The File will probably let members see how close the other contenders are. Once again well done.

 

[Ronald Shaw]

Good Morning,
I don't normally do 2 year old races but lets see what happens.

 

[Ronald Shaw]

Good Morning,
I don't normally do 2 year old races but lets see what happens.
View attachment 22918

1 up Wilsons Ruby 9/4 and 1 down Lovely Memory

 

[Chesham]

Well Done Ronald Shaw

 

[Ronald Shaw]

Hi, Yet again I have done a race I do not normally do a 5 furlong one, Let's see what happens.

 

[Ronald Shaw]

That was very close a short head and first three in first three on RP Std ratings

 

[Ronald Shaw]

No winners today two seconds..

 

[Ronald Shaw]

Hi, It seems that both systems agree on the same top rated in both races we will see..

 

[Ronald Shaw]

This week I think has proved that the RP Std system has been the best, Here is how I work out the going allowance for both systems.

6 Race card I take the middle Two (3 & 4)ratings on my Rankings.
7 Race card I take the Middle Three (3 to 5)
8 Race card I take the Middle Four (3 to 6)
I hope this helps those who want to do there own ratings.

 

[Ronald Shaw]

What a load of rubbish tonights top rated was, HAS THE BUBBLE BURST, we will have to wait until Monday to find out..

 

[TheBluesBrother]

Ronald Shaw

With regards to the Chelmsford racing surface, this is what I posted on theracingforum on the 18th August this year, before Timeform picked up the same topic on the 8th September.

Chelmsford City Racecourse: The State of the Going

The speed of Chelmsford’s racing surface is starting to alarm me.

Yesterday you had the Barry Hills trained Algaith dipping 2.77s under the standard time and setting a new course record, on going I had at +0.60s/f ( very fast),
if you were to compared this against the turf, you would have to return the going as hard.

AW going allowance table:
Fast +0.50s/f
Stand/Fast +0.18s/f to +0.40s/f
Standard -0.15s/f to +0.15s/f
Stand/Slow -0.48s/f to -0.18s/f
Slow -0.70s/f to -0.50s/f

In the inner circle we have a member horseplayer Horseplayer who produces some of the best pace figures on the net, normally as he explains, a band 10 race full of pace runners would normally fall
apart, at Chelmsford at the moment this would not normally apply.

I produced a new set of standard times which I now use to compensate for the speed of the polytrack at Chelmsford.

5.0f - 57.1
6.0f - 69.3
8.0f - 95.0
9.0f - 108.3
10.0f - 121.5
13.3f - 164.4
14.0f - 173.6
16.0f - 200.0

Even using the new standard times, I am still using going allowance adjustments of around +0.15s/f compared to the official going description of standard (0.00s/f).

Mike.

 

[Ronald Shaw]

Ronald Shaw

With regards to the Chelmsford racing surface, this is what I posted on theracingforum on the 18th August this year, before Timeform picked up the same topic on the 8th September.

Chelmsford City Racecourse: The State of the Going

The speed of Chelmsford’s racing surface is starting to alarm me.

Yesterday you had the Barry Hills trained Algaith dipping 2.77s under the standard time and setting a new course record, on going I had at +0.60s/f ( very fast),
if you were to compared this against the turf, you would have to return the going as hard.

AW going allowance table:
Fast +0.50s/f
Stand/Fast +0.18s/f to +0.40s/f
Standard -0.15s/f to +0.15s/f
Stand/Slow -0.48s/f to -0.18s/f
Slow -0.70s/f to -0.50s/f

In the inner circle we have a member horseplayer Horseplayer who produces the some of the best pace figures on the net, normally as he explains, a band 10 race full of pace runners would normally fall
apart, at Chelmsford at the moment this would not normally apply.

I produced a new set of standard times which I now use to compensate for the speed of the polytrack at Chelmsford.

5.0f - 57.1
6.0f - 69.3
8.0f - 95.0
9.0f - 108.3
10.0f - 121.5
13.3f - 164.4
14.0f - 173.6
16.0f - 200.0

Even using the new standard times, I am still using going allowance adjustments of around +0.15s/f compared to the official going description of standard (0.0os/f).

Mike.

Thanks For this Mike, It will give me something to do today..

Ronald

 

[Ronald Shaw]

My Ratings for Kempton 09/11/15.

 

[Bill]

Ronald what is the new trial and the sel ratings ?

 

[Ronald Shaw]

Ronald what is the new trial and the sel ratings ?

It is an Idea I had a week ago, the sels are the selections, If it continues to be ok I will l
put it up on here.

 

[Bill]

Thanks looking forward to how it goes
Best of luck

 

[Ronald Shaw]

Ok the new trial. at the beginning of last week I started playing around with some figures and to my surprise things looked good so I started multiplying this dividing that and what looked good did not work so I left it alone until yesterday when I looked at the races I had posted last week, checked with my other program and noticed that if I removed all the mathematical crap it started to look good again so here we are.
I think you will agree these below in column "A"'s are what I put up Friday and Saturday, Column "B" is the new trial, see if you can work out what I have done, I HAVE NOT DOCTORED THE FIGURES they are real.