Hi Dave, having looked at the data I would say there is some truth in this theory, but it also depends on what you are comparing it with, if you compare her record with other trainers then there is not a huge difference, but if you compare it to her own record on dryer going then there is a very significant difference.As always your thoughts and comments are very welcome and I would love to know if William's horses are that good when the mud is flying. I'm sure some of you will have the tools at your disposal to either prove or disprove this common thought in racing.
Hi Dave, having looked at the data I would say there is some truth in this theory, but it also depends on what you are comparing it with, if you compare her record with other trainers then there is not a huge difference, but if you compare it to her own record on dryer going then there is a very significant difference.
I looked at all NH trainers in UK, who have had at least 2500 runners in handicaps, on this list Venetia Williams is clear by some way in terms of number of winners on heavy going, but that is simply due to her running more horses on heavy than any other trainer. In terms of strike rate, she is joint 2nd (with Donald McCain) behind only Sue Smith, her A/E figure is 0.86 which is about average, suggesting that any advantage is factored into the prices. Now, if we look at same list of trainers in handicaps on good going then Venetia drops to the bottom of list in terms of both strike rate and A/E. A/E of 0.64 showing her runners as poor value on good going.
This might sound a contradiction, but her record with favourites is actually quite good. She is 3rd best on list both on strike rate and value (A/E) on favourites in handicaps, which indicates market is important guide with her runners.
Good luck with your bets today.
Thanks for the info F Frontrunner. Well she has certainly got a very impressive horse on her hands. I got it dreadfully wrong and neither of my selections would have got near to that performance. Be very interesting to see which race at Cheltenham he goes for.Hi Dave, having looked at the data I would say there is some truth in this theory, but it also depends on what you are comparing it with, if you compare her record with other trainers then there is not a huge difference, but if you compare it to her own record on dryer going then there is a very significant difference.
I looked at all NH trainers in UK, who have had at least 2500 runners in handicaps, on this list Venetia Williams is clear by some way in terms of number of winners on heavy going, but that is simply due to her running more horses on heavy than any other trainer. In terms of strike rate, she is joint 2nd (with Donald McCain) behind only Sue Smith, her A/E figure is 0.86 which is about average, suggesting that any advantage is factored into the prices. Now, if we look at same list of trainers in handicaps on good going then Venetia drops to the bottom of list in terms of both strike rate and A/E. A/E of 0.64 showing her runners as poor value on good going.
This might sound a contradiction, but her record with favourites is actually quite good. She is 3rd best on list both on strike rate and value (A/E) on favourites in handicaps, which indicates market is important guide with her runners.
Good luck with your bets today.
Impressive performance indeed, especially for a young and inexperienced horse. I didn’t have a bet in race, but like yourself I also thought carrying big weight won’t be easy in these conditions. Cloudy Lane the only other to carry more than 11-3 to victory in this race in last 20 years, and Royal Pagaille only the 2nd horse younger than 8 to win in last 20 years (Bristol De Mai was the other).Thanks for the info F Frontrunner. Well she has certainly got a very impressive horse on her hands. I got it dreadfully wrong and neither of my selections would have got near to that performance. Be very interesting to see which race at Cheltenham he goes for.
I don’t know if the comparison is right, but I am wondering if he will be like Bristol de Mai?