0/1220.00 Sand - Mustarrid,,,L
A 13/8 Fav out of the frame (5th of 6) and the other plumb last. Cosmic results to date....16.20 Carl - Snookered...L
16.50 Carl - Wensley...L
Many thanks F Frontrunner. You may well be right as I would have expected a historically 'proven' method to have performed much better than it has over the period it's been running.Hi T TonCon, just been looking at your system and I think it has just been a bit unfortunate that it is going through one of its longest losing runs while you are testing it. It’s on a losing run of 41 now, only 6 previous occasions in last 18 years it has had a losing run of over 40, good news maybe is that only twice losing run has gone over 45, longest one being 57, so hopefully this particular losing run will end soon.
I have been trying to see why it is doing so badly this season, and I think weather may have something to do with this. It has been unusually wet for this time of year, normally you would expect good to firm going in May and this time we are getting soft going. I don’t think it is a coincidence that system also did particularly badly in 2014, another year when we had unusual weather and a very wet month of May. And I have checked for other instances of unusual weather and it seems to do badly then too. It’s not that it doesn’t work well on soft going, it’s just wrong going at wrong time of year. In October for example, it actually does well on soft because that’s the expected going and it does badly in years when we had dry October and good to firm going. I don’t think this is a unique problem for your system, I think it probably applies to a lot of other systems too. Trainers have plans for their horses for particular times of year, and when you get weather that is not expected, it must throw those plans.
That’s my take on it, I also feel it can be improved by using another filter, but I understand you don’t want to use too many filters. Best of luck for a turnaround.
God knows...but I don't !!Not directly related, but, Boardman wins three times in a month for Tim Easterby.
Is it pedigree ( Kingman), training, trainer intent and good placing, or none of these?
What factors are important here?
1/1515.05 Catt. - Six Strings...WON 9/4f BSP : 3.70
Thanks pete, I didn't know that. Much appreciated.
I would say he is just a progressive horse. It seems he always had the ability as was rated 90 when coming over from France, but for whatever reason hadn’t put it to good use. Easterby got a bargain, and seems to have found the key to this horse and just letting him run while he is on a roll.Not directly related, but, Boardman wins three times in a month for Tim Easterby.
Is it pedigree ( Kingman), training, trainer intent and good placing, or none of these?
What factors are important here?
Hi T TonCon, I am sorry, I seem to have got it wrong. For some reason I thought you were only looking at horses that finished in first 6 on their last run, just went back and checked your original post and it is last two runs, my mistake. So you can ignore the longest losing runs I mentioned above, but rest of it should still be valid. Also, I know that you dropped those that had won last time from the system, I just realised that you also seem to have dropped those that finished 2nd.Hi T TonCon, just been looking at your system and I think it has just been a bit unfortunate that it is going through one of its longest losing runs while you are testing it. It’s on a losing run of 41 now, only 6 previous occasions in last 18 years it has had a losing run of over 40, good news maybe is that only twice losing run has gone over 45, longest one being 57, so hopefully this particular losing run will end soon.
I have been trying to see why it is doing so badly this season, and I think weather may have something to do with this. It has been unusually wet for this time of year, normally you would expect good to firm going in May and this time we are getting soft going. I don’t think it is a coincidence that system also did particularly badly in 2014, another year when we had unusual weather and a very wet month of May. And I have checked for other instances of unusual weather and it seems to do badly then too. It’s not that it doesn’t work well on soft going, it’s just wrong going at wrong time of year. In October for example, it actually does well on soft because that’s the expected going and it does badly in years when we had dry October and good to firm going. I don’t think this is a unique problem for your system, I think it probably applies to a lot of other systems too. Trainers have plans for their horses for particular times of year, and when you get weather that is not expected, it must throw those plans.
That’s my take on it, I also feel it can be improved by using another filter, but I understand you don’t want to use too many filters. Best of luck for a turnaround.
The system as stands is :Hi T TonCon, I am sorry, I seem to have got it wrong. For some reason I thought you were only looking at horses that finished in first 6 on their last run, just went back and checked your original post and it is last two runs, my mistake. So you can ignore the longest losing runs I mentioned above, but rest of it should still be valid. Also, I know that you dropped those that had won last time from the system, I just realised that you also seem to have dropped those that finished 2nd.
So am I correct that your current system criteria is that horse must be running within 5 days of last run, on turf flat in UK, last two runs must have also been on turf flat and must have finished 3rd to 6th on both those runs?
Anyway the filter I am suggesting is to only include trainers who have a good strike rate with quick returners. I have set it at trainers with minimum 20% strike rate with quick returners. It does cut out a lot of the bets and you might miss out on many winners but it does show a good ROI of 24.5% at SP over a long period of 18 years and 1.24 A/E and 3.97 chi, and also cuts out long losing runs, longest one being 18 since 2003. Problem is you will have long waits before there is a qualifier, there has only been one qualifier so far this season which lost.
View attachment 101122
View attachment 101123
Ok cheers, so I had it right first time. Applying the trainer win rate filter to this improves it also but not by as much, A/E of 1.09 with the filter.The system as stands is :
Flat Turf Handicaps
Last run within 5 days
Placed 3rd - 6th LTO (only last run counts)
That's it.